to bring the troops home and slip away as quickly as possible, the Bush Administration is trying to force them into a
war with Iran. A move to invade and control the oil fields in Saudi is only a step away, with the excuse that the Middle
East is now further destabilized and the oil fields need protection. Bush and those who put him into power in the White
House are arrogant, and determined to carry out their plans. If a civil war in Iraq didn't spill the conflicts over into Iran,
then what to do? Kidnap a few Israeli soldiers, with the cooperation of Israel, and demand Lebanon produce them! Can
they do this when they don't
and why would it not? In the past it has been a major headache for Israel. This was an Israeli arranged kidnapping,
with the soldiers in the hands of Israeli agents.
How will this end? Will escalation occur until the entire Middle East is in flames, Israel using their nuclear arsenal?
One should remember that any nuclear activity in lands bordering Israel pollutes Israel too. One does not defecate in
one's own bed. The hope is that Iran and Syria will engage, will give the US and Israel an excuse so the US Military
can invade those countries. But this requires that Syria and Iran cooperate with this game plan, and that the US
Military will allow themselves to be pushed to take steps they are reluctant to take. If Syria or Iran
the ploy might work, but if they are restrained, the ploy will fail. In the meantime, Israel has weakened itself, by
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta305.htm[2/5/2012 11:42:37 AM]
ZetaTalk: Hezbollah Attack
opening up a second front, battling both Hamas and Hezbollah and on both ends of the country. What will this mean
for Israel if the US if forced to withdraw troops from Iraq and go home? They've stirred up a hornets nest, and are
sitting in the middle of an angry swarm! Such is karma!
Signs of the Times #1621
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta305.htm[2/5/2012 11:42:37 AM]

ZetaTalk: Warning
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
We have speculated that the Scandinavian countries, such as Sweden, would warn their citizens in the week or so
before the shift. Sweden is a country that is isolated from others by water, and is limiting immigration today as it is
considered a desirable social democracy in which to live. When rotation stops, there can hardly be
warnings, so announcements will not be presumed to induce panic. Panic is already in place! Sweden is also in a good
position for doing right by their citizens as they have high country as well as shorelines, and already do ocean fishing.
A simply announcements, to avoid the shorelines and move upland, during the warm spring when this warning would
be issues, would not be out of line. Nor would parsing out any supplies the country has, among the hungry, directly
after the shift.
In countries where there is
In countries where the elite establishment cares not for the public, such as in Indonesia, no warning would be
given as the elite are escaping to Australia, and part of their bargain is to
reduce survival and hordes landing on the shores of Australia.
In countries such as Brazil, where the establishment has mixed roots to the populace and the elite, rumors will
spread like wide fires and many will flee, or attempt to flee, to safety. Such flight will meet the same fate
whether warning is given early or late, as the roadways will clog, cars break down, planes fail to take off or land
properly, and the eventual hills such desperate land upon fail to feed them for long.
Thus, is it
afterwards, that matters. A warning given to those who can scarcely survive is a warning that can only, in truth,
prepare the warned for death. Where survival is possible, warnings are more likely to be given.
http://www.zetatalk2.com/govmt/g178.htm[2/5/2012 11:42:38 AM]
