ZetaTalk: Nuclear Shutdown
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
Among those in power, which are primarily the industrialized giants and the economic giants including those in the
banking system, this is often discussed. Should the governments come clean, at the last minute, and tell the public
what is about to occur? If so, what is the moment to do so? An hour ahead, a week? This is a heated subject, with
anyone seeming too sympathetic with the public being harshly warned not to leak information, and an occasional
accidental death announced grimly as a reminder that this enforcement can and is easily used. Bill Cooper is a recent
example. He warned about inoculation plans, for Anthrax, in the past, and this brought a quick knee-jerk reaction
when Anthrax became a problem. He was out and about with a gun in his hand, having sensed this was about to occur.
Thus, his 'arrest' resulted in his death.
As the earlier agreements between the US and the former Russian indicate, deactivating nuclear bombs has been in
process for some time. The public is not told just how far this has gone, so the deterrent still exists. It is far beyond the
schedule announced, as neither country wants to see itself poisoned by what it keeps in its bed. Power plants are
another matter, as to turn them off or deactivate them would be a clear clue to a watching public that something was
amiss! Thus, this step can be expected only after rotation has stopped, in the week prior to the shift. The public should
prepare for panic in the administration, such that this might get overlooked. The turn-off plans are known to many, and
access to these plants afforded to a number of individuals, such that no single individual is key to deactivating a
nuclear power plant. Thus, bringing this subject up when it is clear the shift is approaching, to those in government in
a broad setting so many ears can hear the concerns, will be the best insurance that this
plants will not be reactivated, due to disruption of the mechanisms during the shift. Few are constructed to withstand
earthquakes, few placed on fault lines for this reason.
http://www.zetatalk2.com/govmt/g133.htm[2/5/2012 11:42:38 AM]
ZetaTalk: Kosovo
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
When you are approaching cataclysmic changes, such as will occur in 2003 [Note: see 2003 Date explanation], there are
predictable changes. As we predicted in 1995, you will have 3 years of crop failure going into the pole shift, and in
1999 you are already experiencing this. This is still, in 1999, considered a local affair, with this country or that country
having a crop failure. Primarily these are commercial operations that fail, not family gardens which are tended
carefully and watched. Large commercial operation are mechanized and therefore are more vulnerable. This will
increase, by the year 2000, to the point where this is considered devastating, and the food stores will be run through.
After two years in a row, the stores will be emptied, and the distress will be extreme. Under those circumstances, what
are people going to do?
They will migrate, their hunger gnawing at them, or become aggressive toward their neighbors whom they might
consider to be living on better land, more fertile land or with a better water source or whatever. So aggressiveness
increases, and this is one of the reasons that in Kosovo, NATO and the US were extremely aggressive and swift and
insistent in saying 'you will
You can look for more of this in an attempt to prevent the strong-arming of the weak as starvation and want begin to
intrude into everyone's lives. The answer to this, of course, is to have your own gardens, to have your own food
development. You do not have to be rich to do this. Gardening is a time honored practice, and can be considered a
hobby among those who don't have to grow their own food. Get into it, get real, think about what you would do if you
couldn't go to the store, and this will actually, in the larger view, help world peace. So do your own part.
http://www.zetatalk2.com/govmt/g105.htm[2/5/2012 11:42:39 AM]
ZetaTalk: SOHO
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
The SOHO, like many of the arms of NASA and JPL, can tell stories. They control the satellites. How do you
determine if it’s true or not? They receive the images, and they relay these to you. You don’t receive these images
from the SOHO directly, anymore than you do from the Hubble. This has long been a complaint of astronomers, as
they have turned off a direct feed so that the public cannot make their own determinations. You’re told, selectively,
what you are to hear, and there’s plenty of time between when the image is taken and the public is given the
