result for refusal to play an activist role.
Such was the case going into the 1997 Mars mission, where a probe was committed to examine plateaus on Mars long
claimed to hold a Sphinx-like head distinctively hominoid in appearance. Severely repressed in the past, shots from
various angle could excite discussion like no other object, as the face would be reveals undeniably as an
natural formation appearing to be a face only a certain angles create shadows giving this illusion. The cooperation of
NASA was imperative on this MJ12 mission, and critical points could be missed unrecoverable if absolutely
cooperation was not assured.
The 1997 Mar's Pathfinder probe, under the
cooperative hand at the helm or face failure, in the view of MJ12, and thus after relentless
arguments with a man adamantly opposed to the new MJ12 policies, his termination was
arranged. This was not a decision arrived at casually, nor was it a quick decision. A
determination that a compromise was not possible, and that Rahe could not be removed from
his post in a timely manner, were factors in the decision. Highly visible operations such as
NASA probes do not allow wiggle room, and a displaced executive was sure to be
interviewed or endlessly hounded for comments. Such exposure, and the risk an angry Rahe
posed, were also factors in the decision. A competent and highly reluctant executive could not
be casually displaced, but a death by an accident seemingly caused by mother nature
arranged, and was deemed the less of two evils.
http://www.zetatalk2.com/govmt/g94.htm[2/5/2012 11:43:49 AM]
ZetaTalk: Moon Landing
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
A hot topic on the Internet and among conspiracy buffs is whether man ever indeed landed on the Moon, or all the
evidence provided to mankind is faked. As evidence of a fake is apparent wind blowing a flag, dust raised by landing
feet blowing about as though air were present to move it, shadows inappropriate for the Moon, and other evidence of
atmosphere or staging. Did man go to the Moon? Absolutely. Were dramatizations done in film theaters? Absolutely.
As is often reported, the early Moon landings involved startled astronauts making statements on live feed about 'we
were not the first' and the like. Likewise, live video feed showed trash on the Moon giving evidence that activity had
occurred in the past, and perhaps the recent past. Evidence of awareness of the alien presence, or other information
given to the general public, can often be discerned from what is
delay in reporting, by
astronauts were on a need-to-know basis, as they were expected to be mobbed if they succeeded and went on the
lecture tour, often interviewed and the like, and slips were to be avoided by telling them as little as possible. Thus, they
were genuinely startled by what they found on the Moon, and their handlers in Houston were unaware of the degree of
evidence they would in fact
instead.
NASA was aware that there were alien enclaves on the dark side of the Moon, but unaware of the trash on the visible
side. During early genetic engineering projects, the engineers often used the Moon as a lab, fearing and wishing to
avoid the large carnivores on Earth. During these genetic engineering episodes, they would scarcely be hiding on the
dark side of the Moon! Why hide? The aliens talking to NASA going into the Apollo missions were Service-to- Self,
part of Alternative 2, to set up camps
side as Service-to-Self aliens do not do density shifting well, ala the movie
their minions to shift during missions, for this reason. Thus, they are in 3rd Density, highly visible from Earth should
they
which were
The astronauts were read the riot act when they returned, having blabbered their first impressions on the Moon. It has
been obvious to those looking at the pattern that
partial release of video and audio was allowed. When a heavy job of intimidation is done, with death threats and worse
than death threats, it takes a lot to release this. Beat a dog each hour, viciously, for months, and then try to tell it that
was all in the past. The dog has lost trust, cowers, growls, avoids, and will likely
certainly if not in the same company. NASA has not changed hands, is still the same agency, infiltrated by CIA, and
thus the astronauts, as their beaten dogs, are loath to trust.
NASA of late has been dealing with its many failures, its inability to get a space station operational in time to stage
escape to Mars, and the months upon months of delays getting any shuttles up at all. Wanting to be a player, perhaps
be viewed as important by the elite with money and bunkers and guns, they hope to be influential in the