Even
the information withheld from him, he or other human scientists would not arrive at the correct conclusions. The reach
is too long, not only because the human brain has a relatively limited IQ, but because the hypothesis human scientists
cling to out of loyalty are incorrect. They start out handicapped, and in order to progress in human society, they stick
with the handicap in preference to independent thought. Thus, they are running down the wrong roads, furiously. This
was well known by the aliens who provided the ships for back engineering, and were the situation to be otherwise they
would not have been allowed to provide the ships.
http://www.zetatalk2.com/govmt/g89.htm[2/5/2012 11:44:18 AM]
ZetaTalk: Mixed Messages
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
Sorting out the truth of a matter from deliberate disinformation or false claims is not the only problem facing the
populace, who hears messages from channelers who are only listening to their own sense of self importance, messages
from agents of the establishment who want the populace to hold all visitors at a distance, and messages from
individuals enjoying the limelight while describing sightings they never observed. When the truth finally does make it
to the front of the stage, it is often dressed in the confusion that the bearer has about the issues, and thus is packaged as
a mixed message.
Each human must confront his own anxieties when first facing the many wrenching realities that are surfacing during
the Awakening. For mankind, this is not a single realization, as the Awakening carries more than news of the alien
presence, does more than simply challenge religion and the pet concept that man alone is in God's image, and asks for
more than an adjustment to the concept of reincarnation and that heaven and hell are of our own making. The
cataclysms, wherein the world mankind had come to take for granted will be tossed asunder within days, rearranging
continents and shattering civilizations, is part of the package. Man must adjust to
thus any given messenger is highly likely to be mixing in his own anxieties with the message.
Government agents, past or present, are prone to feel unease when the structure they have cherished is threatened.
Enlisting in the military or going to work for a bureaucracy is often a way of adopting oneself into a large extended
family. Health care, orders and procedures about every and anything, and substitute parents on up the chain of
command. Learning that the government is going to fail, will not
state of unease that does not diminish. Someone must be to blame, and it is often the alien visitors who are delivering
the message. Thus, where government agents, past or present, are often the bearer of truthful information about the
alien presence or the coming cataclysms, they are also most likely to tinge the message with their own unease.
http://www.zetatalk2.com/govmt/g84.htm[2/5/2012 11:44:19 AM]
ZetaTalk: Half Truths
Mail this Page to a Friend!
In the world of fact and fiction, the most troublesome is the half-truth, which colors the honest reporter in shades of
gray and places doubt against all that comes from a factual source. The easiest way to discredit a truth teller is to mix
some deceptive half-truths into it, and most who hear the report will throw all out, to eliminate doubt. Creating a half-
truth is a favorite disinformation tactic, especially when the target is staunch in resisting other tactics to sidetrack them.
The honest reporter will first be approached with threats and bribes, and most often these tactics either scare the
reporter off the stage or bend the reports in the direction desired. But those with integrity who resist these tactics will
soon find their path strewn with confusing information, all to be sorted out quickly and their comments going into the
record before any background checking can be done.
A favorite half-truth is the leak from a government employee, giving all evidence of sincerity and proffering
documents that to all appearances are genuine. With the establishment withholding proof of their relationship with
aliens, and the approaching cataclysms being masked by global warming claims, hard facts rarely present, but the
tantalizing possibility appears often. Should these possibilities be discussed before proven beyond a doubt? Most often
the reporter brings forth all the material they have been given, and when parts of the report later prove to be ridiculous,
the establishment has won a round. This tactic is more effective than discrediting the individual by their lifestyle, their
motives, their associations, their competence, or their financial circumstances. The reason is simple. Outside attacks are
seen as just that, an attempt to discredit. But when the reporter him or herself makes the claim, then they have
discredited themselves.
