ZetaTalk: Government

known and identified and foiled. This is our input, we were the ones who told members of the New MJ12 what the

plan was and where the evidence was, and who was carrying it. Yes, they attempted to get the physical evidence

because in some point in time the Bush White House will be brought into the docket, on trial, lock stock and barrel, all

those people at the top. It's a matter of convincing enough people in government that the people in the United States

will not be alarmed but will go for this. This has been planned since the election in 2000 was stolen, but because the

Congress was so heavily Republican and unlikely to impeach Bush and the evidence hadn't been garnered in full, it has

been delayed. This has been a constant process of gathering evidence and eliciting support. At some point in the future,

this essential coup of the United States government will take place. It will be explained to the American public that the

Bush administration was illegal from the start, in both the 2000 and 2004 elections, and an alternate administration will

be put into place while proper elections are conducted.

Signs of the Times #1600

What we have here is a time frame like this: We have commuter trains shutting down between New

York and Washington on the 25th of May because of a power outtage. We have a very distraught

Tony Blair appearing on a press conference with the ever bumbling Bush later that day. Then we

have a shoot out in the Rayburn building on the 26th of May over some evidence that there was a

plot to derail trains in the area on the 25th. Part of the information that Mr. Flocco released said

the power outage was to prevent the derailments. [and from another]

AMTRAC has multiple electrical feeds into it's system. A single point failure should not do anything

to shut the AMTRAC trains, even coming at a key point such as where the failure alledgedly

occured. [and from another] 'The outage experienced Thursday was unprecedented. We had a

situation where a localized outage cascaded throughout the whole system.' [and from another]

http://www.tomflocco.com [May 25] The power grid shutdown coming out of the French- Canadian

province was said to have prevented American trains from crashing into one another or into major

rail stations. [and from another] http://www.tomflocco.com [May 31] The altercation turned into an

exchange of automatic weapons fire over a pouch containing evidence files documenting an

operation to bomb the rail system along the Northeast corridor on Thursday.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta289.htm[2/5/2012 11:41:38 AM]

ZetaTalk: B52 Stolen Nukes

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: B52 Stolen Nukes

written September 8, 2007

Can the Zetas tell us what really happened

concerning the news about a US airforce plane

carrying 5 or 6 nukes overflying the US? [and

from another] Sources: B-52 Mistakenly

Carried Nukes [Sep 5] A B-52 bomber was

mistakenly loaded with five nuclear warheads

during a flight from North Dakota to Louisiana.

The bomber carried advanced cruise missiles as

part of a Defense Department program to retire

400 of the missiles, the Military Times said. The

nuclear warheads should have been removed

before the missiles were mounted onto pylons

under the bomber's wings for the Aug. 30 flight

from Minot Air Force Base in North Dakota to

Barksdale Air Force Base in Louisiana. He said an investigation was launched and the crews involved in

loading the missiles were decertified pending corrective action or training.

Closely examine the excuses given out by the Air Force and you can see what actually happened here. These nukes

were being taken out of the country. The fact that they were missing from the arsenal was not to be discovered until

after they had escaped the continental US, having been moved from the heartland to the Gulf where they could be

transferred to a ship along the convoluted and unprotected Louisiana coastline. The locals go fishing daily, and does

anyone check those boats as they go off into the Gulf? The Air Force states the nukes were 'never out of their

control', admitting this theft was an Air Force operation. Ah, but it was an oversight that the nukes were not removed

from the missiles, no? No. The list of steps that had to be overlooked was lengthy, involving numerous people, to

ensure that just such a happenstance would not occur. For instance, person A makes a step, person B makes a step,

both in the presence of each other. Person C asks both if they have performed their step and checks the results, noting

this on a form next sent on to an office. Person D comes in independently from that office and verifies the step was

done, also checking with persons A, B, and C. And this would be just for a single step.

So were all these individuals involved in the theft of five nuclear warheads? Note that if the person from the office

where the form was sent were looking the other way, then the step does not necessarily need to include persons A, B,