and C, or even person D if he was unaware a duty was to be performed. The order to perform the step in the first place
would simply not be made. The higher up the chain this lack of oversight goes, the fewer the number of people who
need to be involved in the conspiracy. But such a conspiracy presumes that those normally involved in this type of
procedure are brain-dead, or so in synch with orders from above that they question nothing. It also presumes that we,
the telepathic Zetas, would be unaware of such a plot. As we have reiterated numerous times, we and humans in the
contingent that is blocking Bush
the public becomes aware of them. The new plan is to allow the public to become aware of the plots, where possible,
so as to
What were Bush and Company trying to achieve? Bush has been desperate to invoke martial law within the US, and
needs a panic within the American public to do so. He is being blocked from simply declaring martial law, which he
has attempted numerous times. Bush has also been trying to bomb and/or invade Iran, and has given this order
numerous times. He has shuffled commanders, each time finding his new commanders are blocking his orders too. We
mentioned years ago that many in the US military maintain a facade of cooperation with Bush, but are sleepers, having
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta402.htm[2/5/2012 11:41:39 AM]
ZetaTalk: B52 Stolen Nukes
arranged to put themselves in influential positions for just such a time when they might be given a illegal order, which
they could then refuse. Bush and Cheney concluded that if US nukes could be smuggled out of the country and put
into the hands of contractors loyal to their masters and the almighty dollar, they could start something - bomb US
facilities and point the finger at Iran, or potentially bomb a facility in Iran so as to incite a counterattack. Once again
they have failed, but what they
act, as Bush is pulling out all the stops. The contingent must now move from passive resistance to a state of war!
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta402.htm[2/5/2012 11:41:39 AM]

ZetaTalk: Military Assassinations
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
Assassinations to eliminate whistleblowers or critics is nothing new. Journalists have been shot in the head or in the
back since the start of Bush's War in Iraq, with the attempted assassination of an Italian journalist one that hit the press
dramatically. Her case, which is still in the courts, is one that came to light, but most are brushed under the rug.
Journalists soon learn to speak the Bush line or be silent, frankly on pain of death if they step over the line. Making an
example is a common way of approaching such issues. Football star Tillman, who was going to become a critic of the
war, was such an example. He was shot in the back of the head, at point blank range. Where the cover-up over this
assassination was in place for the public, the true facts only recently coming to light, the true circumstances were
spread throughout the armed services by rumor, and thus the assignation was considered to have served its purpose.
These two instances are no different. Pointedly shooting a critic in the head, or cutting the brake or steering
mechanisms and installing a minor explosive device so an accident occurs on the road, are assassinations easily
arranged. Such assassinations may pick up in the future. The Bush White House and their cronies will find themselves
more desperate to achieve their goals. They will be more willing to take chances and thus place themselves in
circumstances more exposed to whistleblowers. And past crimes will become a worry, with any possible witnesses
eliminated before they can be questioned by investigators. Such assassinations always have a flip side, as they are
noted by many, and increase determination to prosecute and bring to justice those responsible.
Were War Critic Soldiers Killed To Send Message?
Sep 15, 2007
http://www.propagandamatrix.com/articles/september2007/140907_send_message.htm
Minot Base Officials Say Airman Dies While On Leave
September 12, 2007
