not

reveal more, as there are many more fingers to be pointed, and surely we knew of the plotting and the involved parties.

Why did Cheney not lift the drill when it was clear the plans were going beyond a threat? He's an opportunist. How

did he know the attack was to happen on that day? He didn't, but the attackers knew when the drill was planned. Would

the White House likely have had Bush in a school room during the attack, in front of cameras looking the fool, if they

knew? Why did the FBI not allow the Minnesota FBI branch to snatch a laptop, and thereafter punish the field agent in

charge? Because the extent that the FBI was aware of the threat was to be hidden, part of the cover-up, just as the

knowledge the White House had was to be suppressed. All the guilty throw up smoke, and as the White House itself

was not the perpetrator, they were trying to determine when the attack might happen, and hauling those they were

tracking and monitoring would have stopped that intel flow. Yes the White House wanted an opportunity to declare

Martial Law, but they wanted to pick the time and place, not have it visited upon them. Control freaks operate like

this, they must be in charge.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta273.htm[2/5/2012 11:42:06 AM]

ZetaTalk: On Point re 911

Beyond the known parties, there are over a dozen more involved. Why would we pull back from revealing all about

911, and why are we not revealing the details even today?Nancy's prime job is to talk about the coming pole shift, the

Earth changes and where they are leading, the spiritual Transformation that is in process, the spiritual polarizing

between good and evil that accompanies every Transformation, the burgeoning awareness of the alien presence, and

attempt to hammer holes into the cover-up over the presence and approach of Planet X. She has a lot on her plate, and

deals with tremendous heat over the message that she is delivering, struggles to overcome disinformation teams that

target her as part of their job, and find time to brush her teeth once a day and catch a few hours sleep at night. What

would happen if she were to be front and center of the 911 cover-up? This would consume her life, increase the

attacks she suffers, and her main message would suffer. We knew this subject would not be ignored, would have many

champions, many of which have literally devoted their lives to this issue. We kept Nancy out of the fray, and are doing

so today. She knows no more than is already known by her fellows. She's on point on the pole shift and

Transformation issues, and that's where she should be.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta273.htm[2/5/2012 11:42:06 AM]

ZetaTalk: Echelon

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Echelon

Note: written on Sep 15, 2001

During the Cold War, it was all the rage to get into space. This was viewed not only as a prestige issue (as in who is

the best, the first, the fastest) among those who considered politics a game or were into power plays, it also was driven

by a fear factor. What would the other party be able to do, from that vantage point? Rain down death and destruction

with great accuracy? Peek into bedrooms and boardrooms and undress corporate and government lies as well as

personal lies? How could the current status quo, which is to lie to the people one governs, to lie to business partners and competitors alike, and to lie to the auditors, one’s family, one’s neighbors and church - continue? The thought of

having to be honest is discombobulating to those who have lied since childhood and done this as a way of life during

their professions as politicians, executives, or lawyers. Thus, the ability to put up spy satellites was deemed a strong

offensive against any other party unable to do likewise.

Though the Russian were the first into space, with Sputnik, the US soon dominated and has more satellites up than

publicly acknowledged. They have come to rely upon them, as the easier means of snooping compared to sending in

live bodies that can be seduced and lie to their handlers and switch sides. So much safer having that live feed recorded.

The allies of the US shared this information, at least in part, which was a strong reason to become an ally of the US in

the past. So why are England and others in Europe in an uproar over Echelon, which monitors electronic transmissions

as well as what can be seen from space? What changed? As the Attack on America on September 11, 2001

demonstrated, all is not well within the ranks of the elite who would remain on top during and through the coming

changes. There will be winners and losers - those who drown on islands going under the rising sea level and those who

live smugly in the highlands and deny immigration, those whose assets retain their worth due to manipulation in the

financial market and those who find themselves holding worthless paper, those with influence over the populace and

those whose voices are like noise that gets ignored.

England no longer trusts the US, since the maneuver of wrenching the Presidential election from the rightful electee,

Gore. Where this was deemed a partisan issue in the press, it was clear to those who knew otherwise that strong arm

tactics were going to be allowed, done boldly and without shame or fear of repercussion. Anything goes. Corporate

interests in the US would be pushed overriding all agreements with other countries or the law. This had been

Вы читаете ZetaTalk: Government
Добавить отзыв
ВСЕ ОТЗЫВЫ О КНИГЕ В ИЗБРАННОЕ

0

Вы можете отметить интересные вам фрагменты текста, которые будут доступны по уникальной ссылке в адресной строке браузера.

Отметить Добавить цитату