go
mixing with the air and having an updraft handy, this is likewise the direction an explosion would take. The
Pentagon experienced severe fires, an inferno with no place to go. The World Trade Center fires had all four
directions available to them, up, down, and sideways. The Pentagon had the fuel mix going
barrier so the heat of the burning plane itself could not dissipate upward. Like a blast furnace, encased, this
creates super high heat, which melts many objects otherwise remaining. It is an untrue statement that there were
Thus, where those wanting to incite Martial Law in the United States with Oklahoma City and TWA800 and Waco
incidents did not succeed, they were handed an unexpected opportunity in the 911 events. In that these New World
Order types seem delighted to take advantage of these opportunities, the public is rightfully suspicious, but 911 was
their plan in any manner or degree. Martial Law requires a number of steps outside of what has occurred. The reaction
of the United States public to the restrictions that have been attempted have convinced the architects that full blown
Martial Law would be a mistake. They will rather use the excuse of Homeland Security to the max, and watch the line
so they do not cross it and reveal their true wishes. The constant warning of terrorist acts about to happen are to keep
this sense alive, even though most of these warnings are without basis.
The rumor that the Mosad are behind Palestinian terrorist attacks is like the many rumors that spread about the US 911.
Where there is
They would like to
are saying that those in the US wishing Martial Law caused Oklahoma City and TWA800 and the like, and lost. They
did
http://www.zetatalk2.com/govmt/g147.htm[2/5/2012 11:42:06 AM]

ZetaTalk: On Point re 911
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
At the time of the 911 attack on America we stated that the attack was primarily a financial punishment against Bush, as the target was JP Morgan, a prime player in the US bond market and an insider working with the US government.
We mentioned that 'several unlikely bedfellows crawled into bed with each other, each for their own ends', but did not
name the factions. This omission was deliberate. We mentioned that the White House, the Bush administration, was
aware of the threat, the specific threat, and thus the lack of warning was fear of admitting that such threats were even possible. The
Did this mean that insiders within the Bush administration or the agencies were not involved? This was not stated, only
that Bush and those in a position to warn the public chose not to do so. The omission of any detail on who might have
facilitated the attack was deliberate, on our part. A few months later, when discussion on the evidence showing many
hands behind the scenes, many assists given, to effect the attacks, we commented on the analysis of the evidence. We
made disconnected statements that were true in and of themselves, such as commenting upon how jet fuel can fall
down ventilation shafts and mix with air, exploding at lower levels, or rise up a stairwell if the impact is on the ground
level, creating a blast furnace in the stairwells. These statements, in and of themselves, are not untrue, they just aren't
the whole picture. This was an omission, and deliberate, on our part.
What is known at the current time, much discussed on the Internet, is that
Israelis were advised to stay away from the WTC on 911, that
gold was being trucked out of the WTC just prior to the attack, that
insider trading occurred just prior to the attack on transactions anticipated to be destroyed in the blast, that
explosions occurred in the basements and that the collapse appeared to be a controlled demolition, that
the TWC changed hands to an owner of Jewish descent just months before the attack, that
wiring for a demolition might have been a condition of securing insurance on large highrise buildings in NYC,
that
the owner did receive his compensation, that
the WTC buildings had asbestos problems and correcting this would have cost more than a demolition, that
new maintenance men were about just prior to the attack and bomb sniffing dogs not allowed in the building
thereafter, and that
Cheney was in charge of a drill, involving the US defenses and NORAD and the FAA, of a potential attack on
the WTC on that very day, and delayed lifting the drill so that air defenses were delayed.
Does this indicate that financial interests were aware of the threats being made, the plans being laid, and took
advantage of them? Does this fall in line with our statement at the time of the attack that the banking industry,
dominated by men of Jewish extraction and connected to the Puppet Master, were involved? Why then did we
