was not by Muslims, but arranged by Bush and Blair, to further their interests. What has happened in Britain just

recently for both these men to want a repeat of the 77 incident? Blair was forced out of office, his legacy the Iraq War,

so unpopular in Britain. His goal would be to be proved correct, in retrospect. Brown, his replacement, is not the Bush

hugger that Blair was, and allies with the British people rather than Bush. So having terrorism land on his doorstep just

as he takes office, would, so Bush hopes, force him to change his stance and declare the War on Terror his top priority,

including remaining in Iraq as part of the coalition. All these attacks have the same base, including the attack on Spain

which was thrown in just to make it look like Britain was not the only victim. That the CCTV cameras, an intrusion on

privacy, were central to supposedly identifying the driver of one of the London car bombs is also not an accident, as

Bush hopes to point to this attack as justification of his own invasion of civil rights in the US. Bush is currently fearful

of investigations by Congress into his illegal acts, for which he could potentially be impeached. Just the thing for these

types of steps to be proven as helpful in actual terrorist attacks in London! Was the attack in Scotland intended to be a

suicide attack? The intention was to ram the car into the terminal and then escape just ahead of the explosion, but this

attack, like the London attacks, was stymied.

It is being reported that the cell phones to be used to ignite the London car bombs failed to work as expected, and this

no accident. Likewise the failure at Glasgow, which caused the drivers to be caught, rather than escape in the

confusion following the planned blast. Investigations into the background of these drivers will prove interesting, and

not all in the UK are in line with Blair's thinking, that all these false flag operations should be postured as true

http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta382.htm[2/5/2012 11:42:05 AM]

ZetaTalk: UK Car Bombs

terrorism to further Bush's plans for Martial Law and world takeover of the oii fields. Is this a change from the 77

attack on London, which was allowed to proceed without benign intervention from the Council of Worlds? Yes, as due

to Bush's determined drive to declare Martial Law in the US, he is to be given no excuse to claim terrorism can only

be countered by such means. Thus, what has occurred in the UK and in Spain looks like the work of bumbling idiots,

relatively easily countered, rather than a real threat to the safety of the nation.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta382.htm[2/5/2012 11:42:05 AM]

ZetaTalk: Bush Knew

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Bush Knew

Note: written during the May 25, 2002 IRC Session

The Bush Administration was being warned, well outside of the published FBI reports and previous knowledge about

planned terrorist activities. As we stated after the Attack on America, they were being warned by their allies in the UK

and Europe that the arrogance they were showing, the disregard for other nations fortunes, would not be tolerated. This

is not so much a threat put into writing, as private chat and innuendoes. Thus, they were hardly going to warn the

public, as they were too focused on acting normal. The very lack of warning, the decision to say nothing, indicates they were working under a cover-up of the true agendas in operation. As we stated when the entire state of Arizona, in

1997, viewed a mother ship in the skies. It was not the sighting that was impressive, and proof of a cover-up, it was the

delay in reporting! A 3 month delay occurred before several major media outlets reported it. Why the coordinated

delay? This stood as proof of a cover-up, and the cover-up stood as proof of the alien presence. In like manner, the

evidence pointing to the fact that Bush knew shows not that they were simply incompetent, but were so focused on

hiding the threats they were receiving, determined to tough it out and not let the public know why allies would be upset

with them, that they covered up too closely!

All rights reserved: [email protected]

http://www.zetatalk2.com/govmt/g150.htm[2/5/2012 11:42:05 AM]

ZetaTalk: Insiders

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Insiders

Note: written on May 15, 2002

Conspiracy theorists have noted that during the World Trade Center attacks, explosions occurred almost immediately in

floors below the strike area, or in the case of the Pentagon, above. The theory is floated that these plane strikes were

assisted by insiders, wanting to create the climate that the Bush Administration has been all too happy to take

advantage of - civil rights limited, the military beefed up, and no questions asked as it's all National Security.

A plane crashing into the side of a tall building does not just break windows, it creates a minor earthquake in the

structure, snapping plumbing, as well as rupturing the fuel tanks. Fuel dropping into a ventilation shaft, mixing

with air, is an ideal explosive mix, and would drop down into the shaft to the floors below. This is what occurred

in the World Trade Center.

Likewise, where a plane crashes into the lower floor of a building, such as the Pentagon, the fuel will not

Вы читаете ZetaTalk: Government
Добавить отзыв
ВСЕ ОТЗЫВЫ О КНИГЕ В ИЗБРАННОЕ

0

Вы можете отметить интересные вам фрагменты текста, которые будут доступны по уникальной ссылке в адресной строке браузера.

Отметить Добавить цитату