- a key element of U.S. efforts to develop a conventional weapon that can strike anywhere in the world in
less than an hour - disintegrated and burned up in the upper atmosphere in a failure that casts a question
mark over the program's future. Contact with the Falcon was lost about nine minutes into the half-hour
flight on April 20. The test flight was a part of a research program involving two Falcon vehicles, the
second of which was slated for launch early next year before April's failure. [and from another]
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/38270609/ Earth Atmosphere Collapse Puzzles Scientists - A recent contraction of the thermosphere was the most intense in 43 years
Why did the April 23, 2010 launch of the Falcon HTV-2 appear to burn up? Certainly NASA and the Pentagon are familiar with the high atmosphere environment, as the Shuttle passes through this on its way to the ISS, and back.
There was nothing wrong with their plans, nor was there anything in the upper atmosphere they were unaware of. The
difference between the ISS and the Falcon HTV-2 is intent. The ISS is ostensibly viewing Earth and sharing this data, doing scientific experiments and with international cooperation. The Falcon HTV-2 is to provide the US military the
ability to intimidate anyone, anywhere, in the world. They would rule, and none could stand up to them. The Council
of Worlds would not allow this, as it disrupts the balance between Service-to-Self and Service-to-Other on Earth, and thus allowed an interference . The test flight was shot down, in short, as will all future such endeavors from those who would be kings in the Aftertime.
I took this picture while camping is it what I think it is?
http://www.zetatalk2.com/ning/31jy2010.htm[2/5/2012 2:44:39 PM]
ZetaTalk Chat Q&A for July 31, 2010
Note this recent photo underwent extensive examination to determine if it was a PhotoShot job, and it was
determined it was not. Digital images are encoded, and if worked in an application such as PhotoShot
include a color pallete. There is other evidence, such as dissonance in the pixels, when changes to dpi are
done, for instance. Here are the comments made during this analysis, and the examination results
provided. Below is the enhanced version, which invariably shows doctoring and does not, and the 4-bit
conversion, likewise sailing through as an undoctored photo:
Don (Analyst 2) 'Jezz, you didn't take this with a digital camera, did you? I too noticed, after Waveguide
(Analyst 1) pointed it out, that it references Adobe Photoshop C3..... and no camera name, model #, etc.
Also, it's saved at 72 dpi, which indicates it probably was not shot with a digital. The 10-day time frame
would account for developing the film and then scanning it. Am I right? I do know that some folks might
look askance at the info in 'Properties', as Waveguide points out.' [and from another] Jezz
(Photographer) The photo was taken with a non digital 15 year old 35mm camera. I took them to
drugstore developer to be made into a disc. My husband uploaded it for me, I have no idea how to that.He
said he ran the pics through photo shop to reduce them in size, red eye reduction and what not. Does that
help any?' [and from another] Morris (Analyst 3) 'This analysis has converted the photo to 4-bit and
shows the consistency of the photo.'
http://www.zetatalk2.com/ning/31jy2010.htm[2/5/2012 2:44:39 PM]
ZetaTalk Chat Q&A for July 31, 2010
This is a genuine capture of Planet X on film, in the Monster Sun category. This is absolutely captured on film, as
occurred in 2003, and is also visible naked eye.
According to ZT Safe Locations about Nevada (href=' ../info/tinfx047.htm), NV's climate will be the same after the PS. Also on a ZT Deserts page (../poleshft/p154.htm ) arrows are pointing to Nevada being closer to the equator. Is Nevada to be more 'tropical' or a 'dry desert area' like the African Sahara of sand and
wasteland? Planning for seed growth in the After-time, will tropical plants flourish in Northern Nevada,
or will more desert succulents like Prickly Pear Cactus and the like grow better? Grains and weeds will
likely flourish whatever climate Nevada has afterward because that's what grows there now? If rain will
fall everywhere after the PS, what will a Nevada 'desert' be like with rain falling on the desert constantly
for cultivating plants? I am speaking about the timeframe of when rain falls to when it becomes a full-out
desert area again like it is now.
The Deserts diagram, showing prevailing westerlies curling around in keeping with the Coriolis effect, does not
indicate that the high deserts of Nevada or Arizona will have rain. Rather it shows that when these winds pass over the vast flooded expanse of what is now northern Canada they will provide rain for the lands in the Midwest, including
Nebraska and Kansas. We have stated that the deserts of Mexico will eventually bloom, as they will get new moisture
coming directly off the Pacific. But Nevada has the blockage of the high Sierras to prevent this, as they do today, so will continue as today to be a high desert.
Planet X for a long time already is between the Earth and the Sun. Orbit of PX is extended elliptic, now it
is close to perigee. Means PX has the maximum kinetic energy accordingly the maximum speed. Why it yet
