We have spoken at great length about the stresses on the N American continent as the day of the pole shift approaches.
It is being pulled diagonally, the New England area pulling east while Mexico is being held back, pulled toward the
west. This tends to pull lands to the east of any fault line toward the northeast, while shifting lands to the west of any
fault line toward the southwest. Since rock resists breaking, and friction exists along fault lines, this is hardly a smooth
process. Weak points break, at first. Tension builds, accompanied by quake swarms which are, as we have explained,
like a trembling before a snap. For the N American continent to adjust as it must during the rapid expansion of the
Atlantic would require a major quake though the center of the continent, along the New Madrid Fault line, a widening
of the St. Lawrence Seaway to the extent that it becomes a new inland bay filled with sea water, and a significant slide
of land on either side of the San Andreas Fault line. Most of this adjustment will occur during the hour of the shift, but
adjustments before hand will significantly reshape the N American continent and will, as we have stated, precipitate
emergencies within the US that will require that the troops in Iraq be brought home to attend to disasters in the
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta450.htm[2/5/2012 9:57:31 AM]
ZetaTalk: Reno Swarms
homeland.
We have described a temporary bowing along the West Coast as the stress on the N American continent builds. Rather
than tear along the New Madrid and related fault lines, Mexico at first is pulled toward the west, creating a bow that
forms around California and stresses the rock along the West Coast all the way from the tip of Mexico to Alaska. The
Crandall Canyon mine disaster in Utah was due to bowing stress, and the recent quakes near Reno, NV are likewise
due to this same bowing stress. Note that the current spate of quakes near Reno are almost in an exact line from the
California coast inland to the Crandall Canyon mine disaster east of Salt Lake City.
Take a board and cause it to bow, and watch the fractures. The compression side of the board certainly has
compression stress, but the side of the board asked to stretch will start to fray and snap. As with the Utah mine
disaster, the fraying and cracking are occurring to the
mining accident in Utah in 2007, just to the east of the Salt Lake flats, is in rock that fractures more readily than the
rigid Salt Lake flats to the west, which show no evidence of being affected during past pole shifts while the mountains
on either side of these flats are rumpled. This is also the case with the recent Reno quakes. An examination of fault
lines in California and Nevada show that the great inland valley of California has
Flats, this area retained water in the past that evaporated slowly, allowing a slow settlement that formed a very solid
rock base. It does not
to the east. In the case of the Reno quakes, they are taking the hit for the inland valley of California.
Where does all this lead? We have stated that major adjustments in the New Madrid and associated fault lines will
occur before major adjustments along the San Andreas occur. The bowing will force this, as at some point the rock will
refuse to bow further and the stress along the weak points in the center of the continent will give. The fact that there
a bow along the West Coast is what in fact prevents a major adjustment along the San Andreas until the New Madrid
adjusts. This rock is in compression now, along a curve, and the slip slide of the San Andreas has more friction than
usual to prevent any movement. Will more bowing stress appear? Undoubtedly. Clearly the line of stress has been
drawn, between the Utah mining disaster and Reno, so that vulnerability can be computed.