frozen, they would be in some sort of
state of decay - perhaps the skin preserved, but the internal organs a mush. This is not the case, as your recent
documentaries on the frozen state of these preserved beasts shows! So if flash frozen, and frozen steadily since that
date, then how did the Mastodons get green grass and buttercups in their stomachs? A fast trot to the Arctic Circle?
Does anyone presume they ate snow? These were
remains of Mastodons that were not far enough into the polar circle to be completely frozen are bones and the ivory
that has been harvested from the Ivory Islands for centuries. The bodies rotted, the Ivory did not. A wealth of ivory,
with no flesh to disturb those shipping the tusks off to become piano keys. The permafrost only goes so deep, and just
as in temperate areas, frost goes only so many inches of at most feet deep. There is soil, and mud, and decaying matter
where decay proceeded with or without oxygen, just as it does in your gut where methane gas is generated daily.
http://www.zetatalk2.com/poleshft/p129.htm[2/5/2012 9:54:52 AM]
ZetaTalk: Asteroid Traffic
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
What happens after a major earthquake? Aftershocks, and some of these not mild. Can you imagine life after a
wrenching pole shift, where the ocean rifts have been ripped apart to the extent that the oceans of the world dropped in
sea level some 16-20 feet, worldwide? What happens to cause aftershocks, which we are
last pole shift? After a pole shift, the plates come to rest, but there are inequities where pressure is constant against
this or that point, the weight of one plate pressing against another, or pressing to move in a direction. They are restless
in this regard, a
atop one another in the case of subducting plates. As any engineer will tell you, bridges and skyscrapers and that
expensive new car you purchased will last only so long. There is wear and tear, stress fractures, changes in the
chemistry of supporting structures over time, and finally -
to a new position, and once again the process starts.
Beyond aftershocks, there is the effect of what is termed Near Earth Asteroids, dragged into the vicinity of Earth by a
close passage of Planet X, where they follow the planet as it comes through the Asteroid Belt and then get pulled into
some sort of orbit that includes Earth. Objects, viewed form Earth, are relative in size, in that a distant Mars can appear
tiny but a close asteroid can loom large. Meteors are described as shooting stars, or flaming objects streaking across
the skies on their way to a thud on the ground, somewhere. It is not in the
objects have fallen to Earth, but those events were recorded after the last pole shift, as Velikovsky has documented.
Since the greater part of Earth is water, and many places are virtually uninhabited in vast deserts or the frozen
wastelands of the poles, the likelihood of a large object dropping near a civilized and populated area is slight. Such a
disaster happening even in a slightly populated locale would wipe out all witnesses close by, leaving only those at
some distance as witnesses.
Space shuttles and satellites put up by man regularly flame upon re-entry, so heat from the friction against increasing
atmospheric pressure is obviously a factor. Lightning occurs during simple thundershowers due likewise to friction,
where the electronic charge between air masses becomes different and is adjusted. Why would such lightning not
occur during the fall of a minor asteroid to Earth? Is friction and heat and all the electronic repercussions that come
from that in the atmosphere not present, as they are during thunderstorms? What are the plate impacts that occur when
a minor asteroid does
is this not a shock? Are nearby volcanoes subject to pressure on the lava beneath them not activated? A thud on a plate
results in immediate pressure from
lava pressure from
edges, so that quakes from this source occur too, along with the aftershocks.
This is what Velikovsky documented, in the very true reports from several centuries after the last shift. The
forthcoming pole shift in 2003 [see 2003 explanation] is less likely to invoke minor asteroid passages of this sort, but as the core will shift farther without being drawn into an immediate alignment jerk, it will change the geographic in a more
radical fashion. In addition, the sloshing of the oceans will create greater flood tides than the prior shift. Thus, this
pole shift is anticipated to have a greater impact, and die-off, than the prior.
http://www.zetatalk2.com/poleshft/p130.htm[2/5/2012 9:54:53 AM]
ZetaTalk: Velikovsky
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
