Immanuel Velikovsky was a genius on par with Einstein, which is a fact seldom mentioned by his detractors. Both he
and Einstein were Star Children, and indeed were friends who engaged in the type of friendly argument only two
geniuses could engage in. Velikovsky's Mission was to set mankind to thinking about the periodic cataclysms that have
so dramatically left their Mark on the Earth and human history. Like Einstein, he was berated for presenting what most
of mankind does not want to think about - bad news.
Mountains obviously thrown skyward under extreme pressure, the Ruins of great civilizations with no reason for
demise, flash frozen carcasses of healthy Mastodons with no evident cause of death - all this is put over the wall and
not dealt with. Research into uncharted territory seldom results in solid conclusions all around. Theories based on
theories don't have a solid base. That
of Velikovsky's theories as to the cause of the Earth's cosmic near-collisions are unfounded. Where the planet Venus
was sent into an irregular orbit after one recent pole shift, the upheavals on Earth were caused only by the passage of
the 12th Planet - the major ingredient in the brew. Unlike Einstein's theories of relativity, Velikovsky's theories cannot
be effectively proved until the Red Star, the 12th Planet, returns to savage this Solar System again. Unfortunately for
those unwilling to listen to Velikovsky or contemplate the evidence he so poetically presents, they will be learning the
truth of his theories - too late!
http://www.zetatalk2.com/poleshft/p52.htm[2/5/2012 9:54:53 AM]
ZetaTalk: Sitchin
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
Zecharia Sitchin early on in his career as an archeologist discovered patterns that intrigued him. He had a penchant for
solving puzzles that could be analyzed in this way, that presented patterns, and the more data he gathered the more
intrigued he became. He was hooked. Mankind exhibits a kind of collective amnesia in regard to past pole shifts.
Sitchin encountered similar reactions when his puzzle, forming into patterns, pointed to periodic cataclysms, a
traveling planet the ancients counted as the 12th Planet, large strapping hominoids who had the appearance of Greek
Gods shuttling to and from this visiting 12th Planet, and the inevitable and inescapable conclusion - this would happen
to the Earth
so meticulously garnered, Sitchin shifted into high gear and sought to convince his critics with yet more facts, until his
Arguments can scarcely be discounted by all but those in firm denial. However, today one still finds this spread. There
are those who read and learn, those who read and become advocates of Sitchin's theories, and those who refuse to read
or if pressed to do so nevertheless refuse to absorb or deal with the facts presented.
Sitchin skeptics arm themselves by challenging his conclusions when they are based on ancient Summerian records
that could be interpreted in a number of different ways. Scientists doing research are allowed to present a theory, and
set out their research to prove or disprove the accuracy of that theory. They are allowed to be
wrong, and to correct their theory from what is learned and proceed with further research. Sitchin, bearing an alarming
message that tends to belittle arrogant humans determined to be God’s only creation or frighten those who cannot deal
with the thought of pole shifts or visitations by powerful aliens, is not given this latitude. Where it is clear that the
giant hominoids had mastered space flight to the extent that man on Earth has with their probes and shuttles and space
stations, and where it is clear that the ancient Summerians were aware of the outer planets only recently discovered by
modern man during the past century, other Sitchin conclusions are not to clear as to be based on fact, and thus he lays
himself open to criticism.
The giant hominoids from the 12th Planet tinkered with genetic engineering, and doodled their fantasies, like science
fiction, in murals. This has been taken as fact by Sitchin, who failed to consider that these murals might constitute a
plan, not past fact. These hominoids did
mythological creatures with the bottom half a horse, the top a man. Such creatures would not be created by altering
DNA, as any geneticist will confirm, nor would transplanting between incompatible species create such a creature. Just
as the Bible talks about the evolution of the Earth and mankind in story form, the ancient Summerian tales about the
birth of the planets in Earth’s solar system have likewise been written in many cases to be understood by the common
man. Where the giant hominoids present during this time? They were not, and were thus speculating, from their
vantage point, just as human scientists today speculate about the information they receive from their probes and
telescopes. Thus, beyond the evidence that these ancient records present about a traveling planet that visits
