ZetaTalk: Pole Shift

gradually, so that without the capacity to register brightness over time, and compare closely the changes, this cannot be

proved or even, until close to the end, mentally registered by the observer. High powered equipment can and has

registered this increased brightness. The images must be compared by computer analysis, but the magnification need

not be huge, only slight. Here again, this information will not be made public. Quite the opposite. This information

will be denied and refuted by those controlling the high powered equipment needed for proof.

Astronomy is a science based on theory as much as fact, as needs be when one is looking out where one cannot go and

measure! Consequently, astronomers essentially make their best guess, and often disagree. How far away is an object?

Opinions differ. If one object passes in front of another, there is a solid clue, as the one object is obviously closer than

the other. What is the composition of an object? Extruded rays are analyzed against known scientific facts on how

matter decomposes, but much scientific fact is as yet not understood by humans. They make their best guess, often so

wrong as to be terribly misleading. We are not telling astronomers anything they don't know themselves. Theirs is a

science that truly respects the adage - the more I know, the more I know I don't know!

For those discouraged by peering at the sky, and in particular discouraged by the myriad of alternative explanations for

what is seen, remember that the approach of the comet is best measured, until the last year before the cataclysms, by

the Earth's response to its approach. As we have already explained, the core of the Earth is already responding, and

this measurement is recorded in the rising temperature of the oceans, worldwide. The next symptom to look for is

increased volcanic activity, and larger and more frequent earthquakes, worldwide. This, surely, cannot be attributed to

the Greenhouse effect. It is when the Earth receives red dust from the tail of the comet, as it enters the Solar System

and passes between the Sun and the Earth, that denial will no longer be possible. At this point, however, there are scant

days before the cataclysms.

All rights reserved: [email protected]

http://www.zetatalk2.com/poleshft/p29.htm[2/5/2012 9:56:23 AM]

ZetaTalk: Fall, 2002

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Fall, 2002

Note: written during the Jun 22, 2002 Live ZetaTalk IRC Session.

Given the changes from February 2001 to January 2002, where the anxious public went from needing to go to an

observatory to view, to getting their hands on infrared imaging equipment to image, what can the public expect going

into Winter 2003? We described Planet X as dithering at the mid-point for most of its journey, and only barely moving

from this point even in 2000. Some motion was apparent in that many contactees were aware they could view the

inbound planet at observatories, in February 2001. Likewise, there was confidence in imaging in January 2002, where

discussion of this in February 2001 was not strong.

We have stated that the planet increases speed exponentially, on approach. Thus, humans attempting to put numbers to

our words, and ascertain distance, have created Charts. These are not our distance charts, but human charts. In fact,

there are some key errors in these charts, as where the planet increases speed exponentially, it also has points where it

slows. Thus, taking off from the mid-point, the dither point, is faster than the human chart anticipates. The approach, to

the edge of the solar system, is thus faster than expected. But the Repulsion Force clicks in at the edge of the Solar

System. Why would it not? What do you suppose is keeping those outer planets from floating into the Sun? Thus, the

brakes come on about 7 weeks ahead of the shift [Note: see 2003 Date explanation], when it enters the outer solar system edges. It is going slower, when passing through the orbit of Saturn, edge to edge, than it was upon approach! Thus, a

rapid increase in size and visibility as in brightness will occur during the Fall of 2002 and into the Winter months

following.

To anticipate just when amateurs can with assurance see Planet X in the night sky, look at the image taken on January

19th in France. Compare the blur that is Planet X to neighboring stars. If, before dawn, in the hour and hours before

dawn, you cannot see all these stars clearly, then you surely cannot see Planet X clearly. Attempts are being made to

convince the American public that viewing can occurs as early as July, but this is a known falsehood. Those behind

this disinformation, or should we say lack of information, are hoping a large hooting and name calling sessions

prolongs the period when the elite will be safe from demands for information. ZetaTalk discredited, not by our words,

but by the words of others assuring amateurs that they can see it in July, or August. Was it not last year at this time,

that Charlene was ridiculed by David Tholen for trying to sight Planet X pre-dawn? His ridicule was for her, but lets

now turn this on Open Minded, who is proposing the same thing! What is good for the goose, is good for the gander.

Thus, we suggest that Viewing in Fall, at the earliest, be the rule and rumor, not Summer viewing, which is quite

impossible given the nature of the object, Planet X, and the red light spectrum it is viewed within.

All rights reserved: [email protected]

http://www.zetatalk2.com/poleshft/p155.htm[2/5/2012 9:56:23 AM]