When comparing the Magnitude of objects that can be viewed from Earth, our intent in the general- public
statement made in 1995, we considered all visible light. The IRAS team went looking for Planet X in the early
1980's with infra-red because they understood that the spectrum was almost exclusively
imaging equipment used by observatories would falter. Infra-red, of course, is a visible light to some of us, and
there is some human equipment, night vision, that is attuned to this. Astronomy equipment, to sell, was designed
to locate and image stars and planets reflecting sunlight. Are they not in the business, wishing to stay profitable?
Infra-red equipment is in the hands of few, and very expensive, as it is
observatories, upon demand, and the price tag reflected this. We, the Zetas, with our equipment, see Planet X
from Earth is accordance with your math for a Magnitude 2.0 object. Should your equipment be calibrated to
give an almost exclusively red object the same advantage that the predominant light spectrum from starlight gets,
you'd see it.
Halo of Moons and Dust
As the story of Pluto's discovery tells, Moons can increase the size of a small object, creating the illusion of a
not simply line up behind in a straight line, but twirl, moving
tornadoes do. Thus, viewing Planet X from the front, as it approaches, one would see not only Planet X but a
halo of moving Moons. In that Planet X also is surrounded by magnetic iron ore dust, there is reflection of light
from this dust. When Planet X becomes visible from Earth, to those gazing up from their yards weeks ahead of
the shift, it will be seen as a red object because of this dust. Light from Planet X is thus bounced
cloud, creating the illusion of a larger red object approaching. Thus, those looking for Planet X are seeing
than Planet X in their sights. Until mid-year 2002, however, observatory scopes are needed because they are
designed to exclude noise, and magnify. Each pixel becomes many, and
overlooked.
http://www.zetatalk2.com/poleshft/p126.htm[2/5/2012 9:56:26 AM]
ZetaTalk: Not a Star
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
Stars are
gazing skyward on a clear night. What you see is a diminishing light, from an intense center, to the periphery. Should
this circle, the star, have the light
scopes are registering is due to the extreme intensity in the very center. In discussions on how many pixels, a point-
source, Planet X or a star might assume during viewing, a star
dependent more upon the circle that the eye or scope can encompass, not the source. Should this viewing area be
reduced to the star itself, and not scattering light, is would be infinitesimally smaller than a pixel. Such is the intensity
of light from stars that even at their distance, they flood the viewable area with scattered light that is
Comparing this setup with the diffuse light from a smoldering brown dwarf is akin to comparing the glow from a fire-
fly in the nearby bushes to a laser aimed at your eye from a few hundred feet away. If you still had an eye left, you'd
http://www.zetatalk2.com/poleshft/p132.htm[2/5/2012 9:56:26 AM]
ZetaTalk: Red Light
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
Just as electrons are not a single particle, but composed of some 387 particles, light is likewise not composed of a
single particle, as hundreds of particles are involved in the phenomenon called light. This should be obvious to man, as
light spreads into the colors of the rainbow, and as his scientists describe the behavior of red light as Red Shift, where
no such behavior is ascribed to other colors in the light spectrum. How does this affect viewing the inbound Planet X,
which emits light primarily in the red spectrum due to the cloud of red dust around it though which any light escaping
from the planet must pass. Red light, and light close in the spectrum to red light, bends more readily than other
particles in the light group. This can quickly be determined by the common man if he compares the rising and setting
