ZetaTalk: Pole Shift

toward the Earth and thus will drop into the viewing scope, where otherwise would pass overhead, and thus

viewing Planet X when at the horizon is more optimal than viewing it when directly overhead.

the amount of heavy atmosphere the red light must pass through to reach the viewer, such that if Planet X is

viewed while looking down past the Equator, due to the bulge there in the oceans, thus creating a thickened

atmosphere with its own bending influences.

If the viewer is looking toward a horizon during viewing, it is capturing light that will be bent toward the Earth more,

as it spends more time passing over the Earth than if it were an overhead view. The closer the viewer is to an overhead

shot, the less time is spend passing over the Earth, and thus the less bending that occurs. If the viewer is also looking

over the Equator during this sighting, the viewer is capturing light that must pass over the Equator, and thus the

bending influence that heavy vs. light atmosphere have come into play. Why would this be so? Where it is assumed

that the speed of light is a constant, it is hardly that in fact, but varies depending upon what it must pass through. Man

measures light that passes through space, and calculates the speed of light. In these calculations, any slowing that

might occur during passage through the atmosphere is insignificant, all being an educated guestimate in any case. Red

light passing through thick atmosphere is slowed, by attractions toward elements in the atmosphere and thus, like the

red light coming from a horizon, has more time to be drawn toward the Earth by gravity pull.

Thus, for a viewer on a high vantage point on land, looking south toward Orion from the Northern Hemisphere in the

winter, the Equator must be considered in an offset, making Planet X look further south that would otherwise be the

case. For a viewer in the Southern Hemisphere, no such change will occur. In giving Global Coordinates, we consider

all parts of the globe, giving coordinates that will put Planet X within the scope, thus almost all viewers find some

offset when they discover it.

All rights reserved: [email protected]

http://www.zetatalk2.com/poleshft/p151.htm[2/5/2012 9:56:27 AM]

ZetaTalk: Slowing Rotation

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Slowing Rotation

Note: written on Jan 15, 2001 during the 2001 sci.astro debates.

Could the Earth be slowing in its rotation, as Planet X draws near, when the populace can go out at midnight on

December 21st and find the constellation Orion in the proper place, year after year? Oh, the populace could go out on

December 21st and find Orion in the proper position, this is not the issue. The issue is that December 21st would have

moved to be later than if all the clocks were ticking along as designed, 24 hours a day, and leap seconds only inserted

every few decades. Where the master clock is in the hands of the US Navy, which has been in the center of the secrecy

over Planet X and related matters for almost half a century, this is not a difficult feat. All network computers in the

world, ultimately, sync with the US Navy master clock, most by the networks dialing in during the night and adjusting.

A second here, a second there, and it is always assumed to be the peripheral computers that are off, a bit, when an

adjustment is made! Unless an individual is astute, and notices the increased adjustments required to their watches and

clocks, they assume they are the problem, not the master clocks that run the world. Where clocks can be tweaked, the

Moon is not so cooperative, and thus it takes longer and longer for the Earth to line up to where it can sight a full

moon from the same spot.

The existence of publications on the phases of the Moon and related Eclipse projections forced the Navy to make early

adjustments for the lagging rotation of the Earth. These publications rely on the Navy, the time-keeper of the world, in

practice if not officially. When Planet X was located in 1983 by the IRAS team, various scenarios were played out in

think-tanks, covering a multitude of aspects. As the time-keepers of the world, the Navy had already noticed a slowing

rotation, so slight as to pass notice by the general public. Tasked with keeping the public unaware of the approach of

Planet X for as long as possible, the Navy determined:

1. to inject leap-seconds surreptitiously via its master clock. Since the Internet and networking computer systems

synchronize with this master clock, most often on an automated basis, daily, these adjustments would be slight

and pass notice.

2. to defer scrutiny of this activity by setting aside the official leap-second insertion practice. This deferral was

requested by the Navy but did not get broad support from its member community.

3. to adjust predicted dates and times for the Moon and related Eclipses forward so that by the time alarm over the

potential of a Planet X approach was under discussion around the world, the relationship of the Moon to the

Earth would seem to dispel the notion that the Earth was slowing.

Thus, they changed their predicted data to assume a slowing Earth, and hoped their calculations on the rate of slowing

were correct. Of key importance were publications that put out 5 year or 1 year forward stats on phases of the moon

and eclipses. These publications plan their printed matter at least a full year ahead, updating with the very latest data

from the Navy projections during that year. Thus, when anticipating the worst of the slowing to occur in