ZetaTalk: Science

side, as long as a certain distance is maintained and friction against a table top or other surface is present, they can

coexist with without polar symmetry, however. Why the pressure to snap together and align when poles approach,

where not so in a side by side arrangement? An analysis of magnetic particle flow in magnets placed end to end show

the particles flow moving through the entire length of the linkup of magnets, creating a longer and larger field before the

particles return to the shared south pole at the end of the lineup. But what of the particle flow when magnets are

positioned side by side? The key here is the strength of the fields, and the closeness of the magnets.

If the magnets are of a strength and closeness to each other such that a returning particle finds itself fighting the

flow to do anything but go to the far edge of the overall mega-magnetic field created by the group, the magnets

will line up with their poles in the same direction.

If any of the magnets are of a significant strength, but the magnets are not so close that returning particles are

perforce forced to the outside of the overall mega-magnetic field created by the group, the returning particles will

take the path of least resistance and return via a magnet in opposition. In fact, this magnet will be in opposition in the grouping not because of its original orientation but because the returning flow creates a south pole handy to

the flow, establishing the magnetic orientation. This happens, not surprisingly, in gaseous planets as they have the

greatest mobility in their composition and the least resistance to change.

If the magnet in a side by side arrangement are at the greatest distance from the dominant magnet in the group,

they will align in orientation with that magnet as the overall flow of particles is such at the perimeter of the mega-

magnetic field such that the return south is sweeping like eddy currents at the very outside of all the magnets in

the group. There peripheral magnets thus align in the same direction as the dominant magnet.

When this path of least resistance is established in a gaseous planet, the magnetic particle flow takes a short cut to the

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s122.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:50 AM]

ZetaTalk: Opposition

south pole of the Sun, the dominant magnetic influence in the area. Those particles flowing through such a gaseous

magnet do not return to the south pole of the planet they have just passed through, but move along to the south pole of

the Sun. Magnetic fields are measured by man not by the flow of particles, but by the direction of the flow, as the

orientation is determined by which way a magnet swings under the influence of this flow. Thus, probes sent to measure

the magnetic field of a gaseous planet find their test magnets swinging into alignment, both the south pole of the

gaseous planet and the test magnet lined up to act as a conduit for the intense flow of magnetic particles on the move.

The fact that there is no actual field about the gaseous planet, no return from the north pole of the gaseous magnet to its south pole, is not noted.

All rights reserved: [email protected]

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s122.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:50 AM]

ZetaTalk: Earthquake Predictions

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Earthquake Predictions

Note: written by Jul 15, 1995.

We are not allowed to forewarn Earthlings of impending earthquakes to the extent they would like us to. The rules are

simple in this regard. For humans, on Earth at this time in the 3rd Density, earthquakes are a fact of nature, one that

creates many opportunities for them to sort out their spiritual orientation. Just watch how the populace responds after

an earthquake. Some people risk their lives dashing into shaky building to rescue others, and other people sit and

moan, waiting to be rescued. Many and great opportunities. However, lest some deem we, the Service-to- Other Zetas,

to be cold-hearted and cruel, be aware that this is not our rule, but a firm rule we must abide by as visitors to your

planet. No interference. Should we break this rule, we would no longer be allowed to be visitors.

With that in mind, we will tell you what we can. We cannot warn you ahead of time, saying, for instance, on such a

day, in such a place, at such a time, an earthquake of magnitude such will occur. However, we ourselves are able to

come close to this type of accuracy. Here's how we do it.

The Earth, as just about everyone knows, is covered by plates that move about and grind against each other. This

grinding action is described variously as a head-to-head push, a sliding under or over, or a gliding along the edge on

the way to someplace else. A place where this is occurring is called a fault line, as being a faulty place in the surface

of the Earth, one would assume. Now, where humans spend a lot of time sticking probes into the Earth, and trying to

guess at the tension deep underground and thus the probability of a near term earthquake, they would do better to place

the plate personalities into a computer and let the computer tell you where the next bust is going to be. How would this

be done? Humans have a pretty good handle on what the plates are, and where their boundaries are. Put that into the

computer. Humans also have a pretty good handle on the direction the plates are moving in, as they are staring at the

results after every earthquake. What they don't know is the degree of pressure, and how to restate this pressure after a

quake, which eases the tension in the surrounding rock.

This can be done mathematically, if one takes into consideration the following factors: