the captain
himself. These qualities are often elusive and thus ascribed to something like charisma but their basis is something
more simplistic. The cave man, facing physical dangers, selected the tallest, strongest, and most brutal among then to
be their leaders. These same qualities that allow such a man to defend the group against large predators could be
turned against any challenger in the group. This tradition extends to man's cultures today, where the leader that
emerges is often a large, brutal man. It is only recently that women have begun to emerge as the chosen leaders in
countries around the world.
Once the cave man could survive without constant fear of attack by large predators, other qualities determined the
selection of a leader for the group. When conflicts between groups could not be settled by one group leaving to find
new territory, then war between groups developed to resolve the conflicts, and the leader who was shrewd and cunning
was the winner. The political game of chess whereby bribery or psychological manipulation was an advantage was
born, and man has hardly moved from that tradition either. Today, the political leader selected by the populace is most
often a large, brutal, and cunning man. It is only recently that the ability to cooperate with one's neighbors has been
shown to be a more effective trait. When the world as a whole suffers crop shortages and natural disasters, then war
does not solve a these problems. The addition of new territory only brings with it new headaches. During times of
stability, the population turns its attention to gain for every household. Each head of family is concerned about
gathering assets and their status within the community. Any leadership battles during such times involves promises, a
type of bribery. Self promoting politicians promise that the changes they will bring will increase each family's asset
base and give this or that sub-group more benefits and prestige. This all too familiar political dance thus packs the
halls of power with self promoting liars, who are hardly suited to address a crisis when it comes along.
Since what is facing the Earth in the short term will be an immense crisis, the old models for leaders will be lacking in
the qualities that mankind will need. After the first few weeks after the cataclysms, the problem of looting gangs and
limited supplies will be sorted out, and then mankind will be faced with different challenges. There are few parts of
the globe currently beset with large predators, so physical strength and brutality are outdated as leadership qualities. In
fact, rewarding a large, brutal man with a leadership position puts the group into catatonia, as all fear to offend the
leader with ideas. Where starvation is endemic, worldwide, and supplies have run out, being shrewd and manipulative
also gains the group nothing. What is there to steal? In a world without police or courts, justice against those who
would steal or con others will be swift. The criminal, however clothed, will not be tolerated. Will the group elect a
leader who makes promises but cannot deliver? Today this process continues for two reasons - the electoral system
prevents removal of those who have been shown to be liars, or the country is under a dictatorship. But the world of the
future, after the coming pole shift, will not tolerate such leaders. The electoral process will be shattered along with
communications outside of the local area. Leadership will have to be earned, on a daily basis, as daily challenges
emerge. Those who self promote by brutality, by attempting to intimidate, will die out and fail, as we have often
explained, because their style of leadership assumes a steady support system. Where food production has collapsed,
and food distribution is impossible, all are starving and only those groups where all cooperate will be healthy. The
looting gang dies off when there is nothing left to loot, and cannot migrate on an empty stomach while on foot.
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta512.htm[2/5/2012 11:12:56 AM]
ZetaTalk: Leadership Styles
So what is left, among the models for leadership of mankind? Those that can elicit cooperation among survivors and
those who are resourceful. Today, these are not the qualities of the official leadership, though times are changing. The
tribal models, or those models that have developed alongside mankind's domesticated food production, during times of
plenty, will not suffice. Organized religion fails as anything but a delusion of comfort, playing on man's fears and
confusion but not offering solutions to distress. Attempts to intimidate followers will fail in desperate times, as
rebellion will emerge. Established leadership who rose to prominence on hot air and self aggrandizement will be
challenged by crisis and fail, thence to be ignored. What will be left in this void is the natural leader who will elicit
cooperation and have ideas, be resourceful. These individuals are almost routinely ignored or taken advantage of in
today's world. When the promise of besting one's neighbors exists, taking what they have by force or by cunning, the
idea of securing greater cooperation pales. The cunning brute is selected as the leader. When traditional methods of
solving problems suffices, those who lack creativity or intelligence fall prey to those with intense self interests, who
bang the table loudly and insist that familiar problem solving methods must be followed. Tradition and familiarity and
hot air win the battle. It will be the failure of these former methods of solving problems that will allow new leadership
to emerge, and it will emerge from unexpected sources. We have predicted that children will often emerge to
