Mail this Pageto a Friend.
NATO Conducts Rapid-Reaction War Game
Washington Post, Oct 8
Given the increasingly obvious fact that Planet X is in the vicinity and not going away before trashing the
neighborhood, and the decision and actions taken last August by the US Military to supplant the White House as
Commander in Chief with their own internal leadership, how should the meeting of NATO commanders for supposed
war games be viewed? Would not war games be better played in Europe, where most participants reside? As NATO is
a North Atlantic defense alliance, is not the western portion of the continental US an inappropriate setting? And where
are the politicians, strutting about on the stage and explaining the situation to the public? Compare this meeting to one
some months ago in France, where heads of state from all over the world met supposedly to discuss Iraq and mend
fences, a representation of the worlds countries that rivaled meetings at the UN. The NATO meeting was unannounced,
where in France much fanfare preceded and accompanied the meeting. The NATO meeting is nonpolitical, down to
business, and exclusively involves those arms of the countries represented involved in defense of their individual
homelands.
What is to be made of the
path of Planet X with nukes under cover of Galileo’s death via a plunge into Jupiter, so that planning for disasters on Earth is the only plan to be made? In France, when the White House ruled the world it seemed, invading what
countries it wished, and thus threatening those counties that could not be bribed, the heads of state were told that an
errant planet
should be preventing awareness and panic in the public. Pressure, pain, payment, whatever was required was applied
until all agreed to follow the White House and the major powers in this matter, no public statements to be made until
the all-clear signal had been given. Part of this plan was to alter the path of Planet X, with nukes, and so
made dismissively, an event that was not expected to happen. When the time came to honor those promises, paralysis
set in.
Those with real estate interests along coastlines, retail businesses likely to be looted, ownership of corporations
providing services likely to fail in times of panic among the workers, financial institutions relying on respect for the
dollar for survival, wealth composed of paper such as stocks and bonds, or whose livelihood required the steady state
of the economy argued
Politicians who never expected to be required to do anything other than make an appearance after a local disaster,
swapping resources from one part of their domain to another while acting the hero, paled when faced with the prospect
of having to face the public with
electoral process into their continued dictatorship, insisted that distracting the public with the truth
In short, the US Military, the Defense Department, and their counterparts in other countries, were faced with a
decision - to allow politics and corporate and personal interests to rule, or to honor their oath to protect and defend the
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta33.htm[2/5/2012 11:13:51 AM]
ZetaTalk: Not Politics
people of their respective countries.
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta33.htm[2/5/2012 11:13:51 AM]
ZetaTalk: The Scapegoat
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
Throughout 2003, cooperation among world leaders was garnered by a promise that the passage of Planet X would
occur with little more than minor earthquakes and tides and meteor showers, and the admonition that the greater threat
was panic among the masses who would desert their jobs to loot and pillage and make unreasonable demands on their
leadership. The leaders agreed, especially since they were bribed and threatened to encourage them to do so. That odd
meeting in France, over a year ago, where all heads of state were in attendance to ostensibly talk about Iraq and
mending fences, had a different agenda indeed. Now that earthquake damage has become a daily affair, along with
