a home than with chronicling the film poet's physical, spiritual, and erotic travels.
Neither Yoko Ono nor Anthony McCall have made films in over a decade, but their films of the late sixties and seventies use minimalist tactics as a means of providing new forms of film experience. Ono's earliest films are either single-shot slow motion portraits of actions that challenge viewers' assumptions about the correct 'velocity' of film action, or serial examinations of the body that challenge the commercial film industry's fetishization of 'filmic' (i.e., erotically marketable) parts of the body for periods of screen time that conform to conventional audiences' film-erotic 'needs.' McCall's early films are as minimalist as
Page 9
Ono's. In
(1973) and his other 'Cone films,' as well as in
(1974) and
(1975), McCall focuses the moviegoer's attention on the projector beam (the movie projector is located in the room during these films) for relatively long periods
lasts thirty minutes;
six hoursas a means of calling attention to the cinema environment and its sociopolitical implications: what does it mean that nearly all of our public film viewing involves our sitting in rigid rows of chairs looking up at the shadow products of an apparatus kept out of the view, and control, of the audience? Both Ono and McCall later collaborated with others on films that had quite overt political agendas: Ono and John Lennon made
(1969), a documentation of their Bed-In for peace in Montreal; McCall worked with Andrew Tyndall on
(1978), a feature-length exploration of the political implications of men's fashion advertising and of mass market media practice in general, and with several women and men on
(1979), an examination of the gender-politics of a famous Freudian case.
Ono and McCall differ in the specifics of their politicsOno's films are internationalist, McCall's implicitly or explicitly Marxistand in terms of the viewership they address in their films. At the beginning of her career, Ono was part of Fluxus, an international group of artists functioning outside the mass media and in defiance of accepted art practice and institutions, but as her resources grew, so did her interest in addressing a much larger audience:
(
) (1966) was a widely reported happening in England, and the later Lennon-Ono collaborations aimed at the huge pop music audience and beyond.
and McCall's other early films were designed for small groups in art gallery contexts (indeed, the Cone films and
can be understood as 'light sculptures'), and his collaborative films were designed as catalysts for small discussion groups in big-city art-ghetto screening spaces, or in academic settings.
The volume's final pairing reveals similarities and differences in two filmmakers who have worked toward a 'global' approach to filmmaking: Watkins most obviously in the 14 12-hour
(1987) and Reggio in a trilogy of films, the first two of which
(1983) and
(1988)have been completed. Both filmmakers have explored the relationships of industrialized and 'developing' nations and have emphasized the degree to which modern industrialized society has tended to undervalue regional and ethnic heritages, the natural environment, and the meaningful participation of the individual. Both filmmakers have circled the globe to create a far broader spectrum of people and places than the commercial cinema provides and to focus
Page 10
Ross McElwee and his father (Dr. Ross McElwee)
during the shooting of
(1984).
their viewers on these people not as backdrops for the fictional adventures of Western swashbucklers, but as individuals with concerns, ideas, and accomplishments worthy of our sustained attention.
Reggio and Watkins differ radically in their understanding of the 'correct' production process for such work, and in their assumptions about how their finished films should engage viewers. Reggio functions in the main like a conventional, commercial director: he raises adequate capital to finance his films, then travels to locations with his crew to record the societies that interest him. The individual films are cut so as to fit comfortably into the commercial exhibition system (indeed, he has received distribution assistance from industry luminaries Francis Ford Coppola and George Lucas). Reggio does not assume that viewing his films will initiate change in any direct fashion, but assumes that the images he presents and the implicit ideology of this imagery will affect at least some viewers' assumptions about the societies depicted. Watkins's central concern in making
was to demonstrate an alternative to current media practice. The film was shot by local crews assembled in locations around the world, with financing raised locally by production groups. And Watkins's hopea hope that, thus far, has not come to fruitionmwas that the unusual nature of his film might instigate an international, activist network of those who had produced
-
