beneath the dim street lights, resembled those of military officers. The resemblance was further enhanced by the intricate cockades on our hats. As an upper-classman, I had numerous comical incidents because of this confusion. Occasionally in the evening on some out-of-the-way street we would encounter a bunch of soldiers. Their tipsy and loud talk would suddenly go quiet, their figures would straighten, and they would begin to march in step as they readied themselves for a stiff-bodied, snappy salute and to “devour the officers with their eyes.” But suddenly, having seen things clearly, they would roar with laughter and chastise each other for spotting “an officer who was nothing more than boarding school crap.” Sometimes threats would be sent in our direction and sometimes the dark gray overcoats would threaten to take their chagrin out on us with their fists.
In the lower grades street adventures were an everyday occurrence. The mere sight of our school uniforms and cockades with the school’s initials on them provoked the street kids into bloody challenges. The school’s initials, S.G. [Saratov
16
their way homeward by going “wall against wall.” Both sides had outstanding fighters, their Hectors, Ajaxes and Achilleses.
I also took part in this ancient internecine strife which had been legitimated by tradition. My old Kamyshin habits pulled me to the banks of the Volga where I would go on Sundays or other holidays. I had to slip out of the house unnoticed for this, while everyone was only beginning to rise. It was a great pleasure to get to the water, observe the fishermen, watch the loading and unloading of barges, to mingle with the sawmill workers, to listen to the engaging, boastful tales of the Galakhov boys—hoboes who had received their name from the merchant Galakhov and his flophouse. Among them one occasionally encountered self-made raconteurs who were true masters of the word. When one of them would talk, it was as if he were weaving multicolored silks. After grandmother’s tales and songs, it was here that I found an endless spring of authentic language of the people: fresh, strong, and juicy as an Antonov apple, extraordinarily rich in imagery and laced with maxims, proverbs, and sayings.
But an even greater curiosity was roused in me by two types of people. The first were wayfarers, collectors of funds for church buildings, defrocked priests and deacons, pilgrims who traveled from one place to another and had been to almost all the famous monasteries which preserved the relics of the righteous and had miracle-working icons. Among such people there were also zealous sectarians seeking “the city of God and absolute faith.” The second group consisted of hoboes who maintained their existence by whatever means they could, including petty thievery when times were hard. They turned to thievery, especially in late autumn, to ensure for themselves a winter’s warmth and food in the local jail. Later, when Maxim Gorky’s play
Having lost my mother at an early age, I grew up virtually abandoned by my stepmother. And though she came from a clerical family, I received no religious education in the spirit of the Orthodox church. I took a discarded child’s primer on the Old Testament to be a collection of fairy tales about a serpent which spoke the human tongue, of prophetic dreams of pharaohs, of the sea which parted before a procession of fugitives, of the miraculous survival of youths in a lion’s den and in a scorching oven, of a stone from a boy’s sling which brought down the invincible giant Goliath.
Later, when promoted from the elementary grades in school to the middle ones, I had my personal period of mystic-religious enthusiasms and secret, solitary, prayerful ecstasies. But they developed on their own, having ripened in the secret corner of a growing child’s consciousness prematurely intent on
17
becoming a young man. All this had no connection with the Orthodox church but rather had points of contact with the Tolstoyism of the intelligentsia and the god-seeking of the common folk.
There was not even a hint of a university in Saratov. For higher education, one had to go either to distant Kazan or all the way to “the second capital,” Moscow. There was one
I grew to self-awareness at the end of the 1880’s. It was an uncommonly dreary time, without a single bright moment of political struggle. In a revolutionary sense, society was completely bloodless. It resembled a clear-cut forest in which once mighty oaks were reduced to stumps. There remained only legends of “socialists” and “nihilists” who once had gone out to rouse “the people” and who served as examples of how to resist all power and laws whether God’s or man’s by use of the dagger, bomb, and revolver. A romantic mist shrouded these enigmatic and daring people. Everyone spoke of them with Philistine condemnation and also with a kind of inadvertent esteem. And this impressed youthful imaginations.
For me, growing up motherless under the daily and hourly oppression of a classical “stepmother,” escaping from her persecution into the kitchen, the servants’ room, the banks of the Volga, into the company of street kids, it was completely natural to absorb love for the people, especially as it was expressed in the poetry of Nekrasov. I knew almost all his works by heart.
Since I was myself constantly “humiliated and injured,” I was naturally drawn to all those who had been “humiliated and injured” as well. This was my world and in unison with it I set myself against “the reigning injustice.” Nekrasov broadened this world for me. Thanks to him, this world grew from the servants’ room and my restless street buddies to include the world of all common people, peasants, and laborers.
Sergei N. Durylin, Domestic Love
Born to a merchant family, Sergei Durylin broke with that world to become a person of enormous erudition.