mentioned earlier, plans were drawn to institute schooling for all Russian children by 1922, or, according to a revised estimate fol-
lowing the outbreak of the First World War, by 1925. Educational prospects had never looked brighter in Russia than on the eve of the revolutions of 1917.
The problem, however, remained immense. Russians needed all kinds of training but above all the acquisition of simple literacy. Although by the end of the nineteenth century Russia had 76,914 elementary schools for children and 1,785 for adults with a total of 4.1 million students, and by 1915 the number of students had grown to over 8 million, on the eve of the October Revolution somewhat more than half of the population of the country was illiterate. To be more precise, in 1917 literacy extended in all probability to only about 45 per cent of the people.
At the other end of the educational ladder, universities increased in number, although slowly. The so-called Novorossiiskii University - referring to the name of the area,
The Academy of Sciences, the universities, and other institutions of higher learning developed, or rather continued to develop, science and scholarship in Russia. In fact, in the period from the emancipation of the serfs until the revolutions of 1917, Russians made significant contributions in almost every area of knowledge. In mathematics, while no one quite rivaled Lobachevsky, a considerable number of outstanding Russian mathematicians made their appearance, including Pafnutii Chebyshev in St.
Petersburg and a remarkable woman, Sophia Kovalevskaia, who taught at
Advances in the biological sciences rivaled those in the physical. Alexander Kovalevsky produced classic works in zoology and embryology, while his younger brother, Vladimir, the husband of the mathematician, made important contributions to paleontology - and, incidentally, was much appreciated by Darwin. The famous embryologist and bacteriologist Elijah Mechnikov, who did most of his work in the Pasteur Institute in Paris, concentrated on such problems as the function of the white corpuscles, immunity, and the process of aging. Medicine developed well in Russia during the last decades of the empire, both in terms of quality and, after the zemstvo reform, in terms of accessibility to the masses. Following the lead of an outstanding anatomist, surgeon, teacher, and public figure, Nicholas Pirogov, who died in 1881, and others, Russian doctors exhibited a remarkable civic spirit and devotion to their work and their patients.
Russian contributions to physiology were especially striking and important, and they overlapped into psychology. Ivan Sechenov, who taught in several universities for about half a century and died in 1905, did remarkable research on gases in blood, nerve centers, and reflexes and on other related matters. Ivan Pavlov, who lived from 1849 to 1936 and whose epoch-making experiments began in the 1880's, established through his studies of dogs' reactions to food the existence and nature of conditioned reflexes, and, further developing his approach, contributed enormously to both theory and experimental work in physiology and to behavioral psychology.
The social sciences and the humanities also prospered. Russian scholars engaged fruitfully in everything from law to oriental studies and from economics to folklore. In particular, Russian historiography flourished in the last decades of the nineteenth and the first of the twentieth century.
Building on the work of Serge Soloviev and other pioneers, Basil Kliuchevsky, Serge Platonov, Matthew Liubavsky, Paul Miliukov, and their colleagues in effect established Russian history as a rich and many-sided field of learning. Their works have not been surpassed. Other Russians made notable contributions to the histories of other countries and ages, as did the medievalist Paul Vinogradov and the specialist in classical antiquity Michael Rostovtzeff. While Russian historiography profited greatly from the sociological emphasis characteristic of the second half of the nineteenth century, the 'silver age' stimulated the history of art, which could claim in Russia such magnificent specialists as Nikodim Kondakov, Alexander Benois, and Igor Grabar, and it led to a revival of philosophy, esthetics, and literary criticism.
After the 'great reforms' as before them, literature continued to be the chief glory of Russian culture, and it also became a major source of Russian influence on the West, and indeed on the world. That happened in spite of the fact that the intellectual climate in Russia changed and became unpropitious for creative expression. Instead of admiring art, poetry, and genius, as had been common in the first half of the nineteenth century, the influential critics of the generation of the sixties and of the following decades emphasized utility and demanded from the authors a clear and simple social message. Logically developed, civic literature led to Chemyshevsky's novel,
Ivan Turgenev lived from 1818 to 1883 and became famous around 1850 with the gradual appearance of his
the idealists of the '40's and the later liberals, nihilists, and populists. Indeed, it was Turgenev's hero, Bazarov, who gave currency to the concept