person at another is his or her history, and in Defoe that history is largely rendered in terms of events and actions rather than states of mind.
Thus, although characters in all the tales speak autobiographically, they do so as if able to observe themselves from without, and with the awareness that their identity derives in part from being seen or described by others within a public space. Part of this phenomenon may follow from the fiction that the narratives are written, edited, or published some years after the events described. Part of it stems from the fact that the narrators tell their tales at some physical distance from the scenes they describe. As one critic puts it, exile is often the condition of narrative-a point that
One critic sees the habit of converting the self into an emblem as proof of Defoe's «Puritan» habits of representation. But the «self» that emerges operates at some distance from the speaking «I» for other, perhaps less logical reasons as well. The self seems oddly disjointed in other ways:
As one critic has phrased it, Defoe characteristically renders the self as 'displaced.' He tends to depict characters' propensity to discover aspects of themselves in others, or others' tendencies to assume, as if by osmosis, the narrator's qualities. In Roxana, Amy shares and manages Roxana's plot to the extent that even their sexual histories are intertwined: in a reversal of the usual anthropological model, female bonding is secured by trading in men. Amy's management of Roxana's reputation by manipulating gossip is also a participation in Roxana's identity since that identity is inseparable (until the end) from her public value. Moll develops a symbiotic relationship with her «governess» or fence; Robinson has Xury at the beginning (whom he sells) and Friday at the end (whom he has effectively enslaved), almost as if they play the fool and Edgar to Robinson's Lear. The episodes in
Roxana is also a name that clothes an identity with a certain reputation, one that both she and Amy are keen to manipulate and censor: the issue is often a question of how Roxana is known or said to be known, so that gossip as a form of social advertising assumes a high value. Significantly, the truth about Roxana's private identity and her past surfaces in the figure of her long-abandoned daughter who tenaciously pursues her; and it is equally significant that only at this point in the plot do we learn that Roxana's true name is the same as her daughter's, Susan. (Roxana reports this as if there were an identity linking her with -43- her daughter: 'She was my own Name,' she writes [my emphasis].) Here, true identity comes as a threat both to the narrator and to the continuity of narrative itself: Roxana breaks off soon after the protagonist flees to Holland to escape the potential consequences of discovery. True identity presents an equally significant threat to Moll, since it is by such knowledge that she learns that she has married her own brother: few themes could better threaten social and narrative development than incest. Roxana's real name also threatens her politically, since she has earlier enjoyed the changeability of public and conventional definition, such that even her gender becomes fluid: she tells the merchant who proposes to her, 'I wou'd be a Man-Woman; for as I was born free, I wou'd die so.' (She elaborates elsewhere by writing, 'while a Woman was single, she was a Masculine in her politick Capacity.')
I have suggested that the abiding question seems to be how the individual enters both a political and fiscal economy. Defoe's narratives appear to pose it by more than one device: like the individual in Thomas Hobbes's Leviathan or John Locke's Essay Concerning Human Understanding and Two Treatises of Government, the character begins life as a social minimum, a kind of atom that only becomes defined as a character and a social or political agent by virtue of accumulating experience in the public world. The obligations individuals develop are not the most obvious or natural ones, so that, as in Hobbes's contract by which such individuals yield up their powers to the sovereign, we are made conscious of the artifice by which those individuals deal with the world and with others. The emphasis on the artifice necessary for the construction of a viable social economy explains in part why narrators dissimulate even to those they love, and why characters are often obsessed by clothing, since they are conscious of how they are seen and marked from without: in the last part of her story, Roxana becomes increasingly defined by the fact that she has on occasion donned a Turkish costume; and her daughter intuits the truth about her precisely because that costume has become a public and forensic sign of who Roxana is. One symptom of Moll's economic and social confidence at the end of her story is the fact that she dresses her husband James in finery 'to make him appear, as he really was, a very fine Gentleman.' The preface to Roxana appropriately speaks of tale-telling as a form of dressing up: the editor will not dress up 'the Story in worse Cloathes than the Lady.'
In contrast to the Victorian hero or heroine, Defoe's characters become less rather than more essentially themselves. They always have -44- tangential relations to their own family histories-or have none-and often they abandon the family obligations they do develop, as if to render the construction of social bonds as strenuous as possible. Robinson deliberately defies his father; H. F. remains in plague-stricken London while his brother escapes (much as the fickle Restoration court escapes to Oxford). Although the cavalier retains an important tie to his father, it is clear that the paternal role is assumed by Gustavus Adolphus, the ideal king and military commander, virtues the cavalier subsequently imputes to Fairfax.