greet me with that sun thine eyeTo change your day of youth to sullen night,Then in the number let me pass untoldSo that myself bring water for my stain,That poor retention could not so much holdKnowing thy heart torment me in disdain:O cunning love, with tears thou keep’st me blind,
Since I left you my eye is in my mind.
They are, I suppose, no more than a game, but one which can be surprisingly revealing. If nothing else, they provide a harmlessly productive way of getting to know a particular poet’s way with phrase and form. Centos that mix completely dissimilar poets’ lines are another harmless kind of comic invention.
THE CLERIHEWELIZABETH BARRETTWas kept in a garret.Her father resented it bitterlyWhen Robert Browning took her to Italy.ALFRED, LORD TENNYSONPreferred Victoria Sponge to venison.His motto was ‘Regina semper floreat’And that’s how he became Poet Laureate.OSCAR WILDEHad his reputation defiled.When he was led from the dock in tearsHe said ‘We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking
at two years.’D. H. LAWRENCEHeld flies in abhorrence.He once wrote a verse graffitoDeploring the humble mosquito.TED HUGHESHad a very short fuse.What prompted his wrathWas being asked about Sylvia Plath.
The CLERIHEW is named after Edmund Clerihew Bentley, father of Nicolas, that peerless illustrator who always signed his work ‘Nicolas Bentley Drew the pictures’. The rules state that clerihews be non-metrically written in two couplets, the first of which is to be a proper name and nothing else. The best-known originals include:Christopher WrenSaid ‘I am going to dine with some men,‘If anyone callsSay I am designing St Paul’s.’Sir Humphrey DavyAbominated gravy.He lived in the odiumOf having discovered sodium.John Stuart Mill,By a mighty effort of will,Overcame his natural bonhomieAnd wrote ‘Principles of Economy’.
Metrical clumsiness is very much a desideratum; indeed, it is considered extremely bad form for a clerihew to scan. Properly done, they should tell some biographical truth, obvious or otherwise, about their subject, rather than be sheer nonsense. Sir Humphrey’s dislike of gravy, for example, may well be whimsical tosh, but he did discover sodium: I have tried to cleave to this requirement in my clerihews on the poets. Clerihews have therefore some utility as biographical mnemonics.
THE LIMERICKThere was a middle-aged writer called FryWhose book on verse was a lie.For
Unlike clerihews, LIMERICKS, as we discovered when considering their true metrical nature (we decided they were anapaestic, if you recall), do and must scan. I am sure you need to be told little else about them. The name is said to come from a boozy tavern chorus ‘Will you come up to Limerick?’. Although they are popularly associated with Edward Lear, anonymous verses in the ‘There was an old woman of…’ formulation pre-dated him by many years:A merry old man of Oporto,Had long had the gout in his fore-toe;And oft when he spokeTo relate a good joke,A terrible twinge cut it short-O.Said a very proud Farmer at Reigate,When the Squire rode up to his high gate
‘With your horse and your hound,You had better go round,For, I say, you shan’t jump over my gate.’
That pair was accompanied by Cruikshank illustrations in a children’s ‘chap-book’ of around 1820 when Lear was just eight or nine years old. Oddly, these examples accord more closely to the modern sense of what a limerick should be than Lear’s own effusions, in which the last line often lamely repeats the first.There was an Old Man of the West,Who wore a pale plum-coloured vest;When they said, ‘Does it fit?’He replied, ‘Not a bit!’That uneasy Old Man of the West.
Rather flat to the modern ear, I find. We prefer a punchline:Girls who frequent picture palacesSet no store by psychoanalysis.And although Sigmund FreudWould be greatly annoyed,They cling to their long-standing fallacies.
Or
When I began collecting the works of Norman Douglas I was delighted to find a copy of his 1928 anthology,
Reflections on Comic and Impolite Verse
Comic forms such as the limerick and the clerihew are the pocket cartoons of poetry. Often they fail dismally to provoke the slightest smile–although those collected by Norman Douglas can certainly provoke cries of outrage and s(t)imulated disgust. It seems to me that the City of Poesy, with its associations of delicacy, refined emotion and exquisite literacy is all the richer for having these moral slums within its walls. No metropolis worth visiting is without its red-light district, its cruising areas and a bohemian village where absinthe flows, reefers glow and love is free. W. H. Auden wrote obscene comic verse which you will not find anthologised by Faber and Faber,14 and even the retiring Robert Frost had the occasional reluctant (and unconvincing) stab at being saucy. Obscenity is a fit manner for comic verse; without it the twin horrors of whimsy and cuteness threaten. There is surely no word in the language that causes the heart to sink like a stone so much as ‘humorous’. Wit is one thing, bawdy another, but