“There’s been a development in the Perry matter he’d want to know about.”
“Be more specific.”
“It may be turning into a serial-murder case.”
Thirty seconds later Kline was on the phone-edgy, pressured, and intrigued. “Serial murder? What the hell are you talking about?”
Gurney described the Vallory discovery, pointing out the sexual anger in the words of the prologue, explaining how it might relate not only to Jillian but to the missing girls.
“Isn’t all that pretty iffy? I don’t get how anything has really changed. I mean, this afternoon you were saying that Hector Flores might be at the center of everything, or then again he might not be, we didn’t really have any solid facts, we needed to keep an open mind. So what happened to the open mind? How did this suddenly turn into serial murder? And by the way, why are you calling me with this, not the police?”
“Maybe it’s just that the focus got clearer once I read that Vallory thing and felt the hatred in it. Or maybe it’s just that word:
“You honestly think that Flores was persuading girls to leave home under the smoke screen of an argument so he could kill them without anyone bothering to look for them?” Kline’s voice conveyed a mixture of worry and incredulity.
“Until we find them alive, I think it’s a possibility we have to take seriously.”
The defensive reflex in Kline spit back, “I wouldn’t take it any other way.” Then he added earnestly, as though he were being taped for broadcast, “I can’t think of anything more serious than the possibility of a kidnapping- and-murder conspiracy-if, God forbid, that’s what we’re dealing with here.” He paused, his tone turning suspicious. “Returning to the protocol issue, how come I’m getting this call instead of BCI?”
“Because you’re the only decision maker who’s making any sense to me.”
“Why do you say that?” Kline’s fondness for flattery was obvious in his voice.
“The emotional undercurrent in that conference room today was nuts. I know that Rodriguez and Hardwick never cared much for each other, which was obvious on the Mellery case, but whatever the hell’s going on now, it’s becoming dysfunctional. There’s zero objectivity. It’s like a war, and I have the impression that every new development is going to be evaluated by those guys on the basis of which side it helps. You don’t seem to be entangled in that mess, so I’d rather talk to you.”
Kline paused. “You don’t know what happened with your buddy?”
“Rodriguez nailed him for an over-the-limit BAC on duty.”
“What!?”
“Suspended him for drinking on the job, hung a possible DWI over his head, threatened his pension, forced him to go to rehab as a condition for ending the suspension. I’m surprised you don’t know about this.”
“When did it happen?”
“Month and a half ago? Twenty-eight-day rehab. Jack’s back on the job maybe ten days.”
“Jesus.” Gurney had figured that part of Hardwick’s reason for setting him up with Val Perry was the hope that some new discovery would put Rodriguez in a bad light, but this news went a long way toward explaining the negative energy bouncing around that conference room.
“I’m surprised you didn’t know about it,” Kline repeated, enough disbelief in his tone to make it an accusation.
“If I’d known, I’d never have gotten involved,” said Gurney. “But it’s all the more reason to keep my exposure limited to my client and to you-assuming that a direct line of contact with me isn’t going to poison your relationship with BCI.”
Kline took so long to mull this over that Gurney imagined the man’s risk-reward calculator starting to smolder from an overload of permutations.
“Okay-with one major caution. It has to be perfectly clear that you’re working for the Perry family, independently of this office. Which means that under no circumstances can you imply that you’re covered by our investigatory authority or by any form of immunity. You proceed as Dave Gurney, private citizen, period. With that understanding, I’d be happy to listen to whatever you have to say. Believe me, I have nothing but respect for you. Based on your NYPD homicide record and your role in solving the Mellery case, how could I not? We just need to be clear about your
Gurney smiled at Kline’s predictability. The man never strayed from the one guiding principle of his life:
“One question, Sheridan: How do I get in touch with Rebecca Holdenfield?”
Kline’s voice tightened with an attorney’s skepticism. “What do you want from her?”
“I’m starting to get a sense of our killer. Very hypothetical, nothing that firm yet, but it might help me to have someone with her background as a sounding board.”
“There some reason you don’t want to call the killer by his name?”
“Hector Flores?”
“You have a problem with that?”
“Couple of problems. Number one, we don’t know that he was alone in the cottage when Jillian went in, so we don’t know that he’s the killer. Come right down to it, we don’t know that he was in the cottage at all. Suppose someone else was in there instead, waiting for her? I realize it’s unlikely-all I’m saying is, we don’t
“Why am I getting the feeling I’m on a merry-go-round-that every damn thing I think is settled comes flying around at me again?”
“Merry-go-round doesn’t sound so bad. To me it feels more like being sucked down a drain.”
“And you want to suck Becca down with you?”
Gurney chose not to react to whatever nasty suggestion Kline was making. “I want her to help me stay realistic-provide boundaries for the image I’m forming of the man I’m after.”
Perhaps jarred by the commitment in those last four words, perhaps reminded of Gurney’s unparalleled record of homicide arrests, Kline’s tone changed.
“I’ll have her call you.”
An hour later Gurney was sitting in front of his computer screen at the desk in his den, staring into the emotionless black eyes of Peter Piggert-a man who might have something in common with the murderer of Jillian Perry and quite a lot in common with the villain in Edward Vallory’s lost play. Gurney wasn’t sure whether he’d been drawn back to the computer-art portrait he’d done of the man a year earlier because of its possible relevance to the psychology of his current quarry or because of its new financial potential.
Piggert at the age of fifteen had murdered his father in order to pursue without obstruction a profoundly sick relationship with his mother. He got her pregnant twice and had two daughters with her. Fifteen years later, at the age of thirty, he murdered his mother in order to pursue without obstruction an equally sick relationship with their daughters, then thirteen and fourteen.
To the average observer, Piggert appeared to be the most ordinary of men. But to Gurney there had seemed from the beginning to be something not quite right about the eyes. Their dark placidity seemed eerily bottomless. Peter Piggert seemed to view the world in a way that justified and encouraged any action that might please him, regardless of its effect on anyone else. Gurney wondered if it was a man like Piggert whom Scott Ashton had in mind when he floated his provocative theory that a sociopath is a creature with “perfect boundaries.”
As he stared into the disconcerting stillness of those eyes, Gurney was more certain than ever that the man’s principal drive was an overwhelming need to control his environment. His vision of the proper order of things was