Против интеллектуальной собственности

Essay on Method. 2nd ed. Kansas City: Sheed Andrews and McMeel, 1962.

* Mises, Ludwig von. Human Action. 3rd rev. ed. Chicago: Henry Regnery, 1966. (см. русск. издание - http://www.libertarium.ru/libertarium/humanact)

* Mises, Ludwig von. The Theory of Money and Credit. Translated by H.E. Batson. 1912; reprint, Indianapolis, Ind.: Liberty Fund, 1980.

* Mises, Ludwig von. Epistemological Problems of Economics. Translated by George Reisman. New York: New York University Press, 1981.

* Mises, Ludwig von. Socialism: An Economic and Sociological Analysis. 3rd rev. ed. Translated by J. Kahane. Indianapolis, Ind.: Liberty Press, 1981.

* Moore, Adam D., ed. Intellectual Property: Moral, Legal, and Ethical Dilemmas. New York: Rowman and Littlefield, 1997.

* Nance, Dale A. «Foreword: Owning Ideas». In «Symposium: Intellectual Property». Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 13, no. 3 (Summer 1990).

* National Commission on New Technological Uses (CONTU) of Copyright Works. Final Report. July 31, 1978. Washington, D.C.: Library of Congress, 1979.

* New York Intellectual Property Law Association. «FAQ on IP». http://www.nyipla.org/public/10_faq.html

* Nimmer, Melville B., and David Nimmer. Nimmer on Copyright. New York: Matthew Bender, 2000.

* Nozick, Robert. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books, 1974.

* Oppedahl & Larson LLP. «Intellectual Property Law Web Server». http://www.patents.com

* Palmer, Tom G. «Intellectual Property: A Non-Posnerian Law and Economics Approach». Hamline Law Review 12 (1989).

* Palmer, Tom G. «Are Patents and Copyrights Morally Justified? The Philosophy of Property Rights and Ideal Objects». In «Symposium: Intellectual Property». Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 13, no. 3 (Summer 1990).

* Patent and License Exchange. http://www.pl-x.com

* Patent and Trademark Office Society. «Home Page». http://www.ptos.org

* Patent Auction. «Online Auction for Intellectual Properties». http://www.patentauction.com

* Plant, Arnold. «The Economic Theory Concerning Patents for Inventions». In Selected Economic Essays and Addresses. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1974.

* Posner, Richard A. Economic Analysis of Law. 4th ed. Boston: Little, Brown, 1992.

* Prusak, Leonard. «The Economic Theory Concerning Patents and Inventions». Economica 1 (1934), pp. 30-51.

* Prusak, Leonard. «Does the Patent System Have Measurable Economic Value?» AIPLA Quarterly Journal 10 (1982), pp. 50-59.

* Rand, Ayn. Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal. New York: New American Library, 1967.

* Reisman, George. Capitalism: A Treatise on Economics. Ottawa, Ill.: Jameson Books, 1996.

* Rothbard, Murray N. Man, Economy, and State. Los Angeles: Nash Publishing, 1962.

* Rothbard, Murray N. An Austrian Perspective on the History of Economic Thought. Vol. 1, Economic Thought Before Adam Smith. Brookfield, Vt.: Edward Elgar, 1995.

* Rothbard, Murray N. The Logic of Action One. Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar, 1997.

* Rothbard, Murray N. The Ethics of Liberty. New York: New York University Press, 1998.

* Schulman, J. Neil. «Informational Property: Logorights». Journal of Social and Biological Structures (1990).

* Source Translation Optimization. «Legal Resources and Tools for Surviving the Patenting Frenzy of the Internet, Bioinformatics, and Electronic Commerce». http://www.bustpatents.com

* Spencer, Herbert. The Principles of Ethics. Vol. 2. 1893; reprint, Indianapolis, Ind.: Liberty Press, 1978.

* Spooner, Lysander. «The Law of Intellectual Property: or An Essay on the Right of Authors and Inventors to a Perpetual Property in Their Ideas». In The Collected Works of Lysander Spooner. Vol. 3. Edited by Charles Shively. 1855; reprint, Weston, Mass.: M&S Press, 1971).

* Tuccile, Jerome. It Usually Begins with Ayn Rand. San Francisco: Cobden Press, 1971.

* United States Copyright Office. http://lcweb.loc.gov/copyright

* United States Department of Commerce, Patent and Trademark Office. http://www.uspto.gov

* Universal Scientific Publications Company. http://www.tuspco.com

* van Slyke, Paul C., and Mark M. Friedman. «Employer’s Rights to Inventions and Patents of Its Officers, Directors, and Employees». AIPLA Quarterly Journal 18 (1990).

* «Wacky Patent of the Month». http://colitz.com/site/wacky.htm

* Walker, Jesse. «Copy Catfight: How Intellectual Property Laws Stifle Popular Culture». Reason (March 2000).

* Walterscheid, Edward C. «Thomas Jefferson and the Patent Act of 1793». Essays in History 40 (1998).

* Woodcock, Washburn, Kurtz, Mackiewicz and Norris. «Legal Links». http://www.woodcock.com/links/links.htm

,

Примечания

1

(Перевод опущен, в русском языке значимой разницы в терминах, о которых идет речь в примечании, не существует - прим. перев.) Terms like «realty», «personalty», and «tangible» are common-law terms; analogous civil-law terms are «immovables», «movables», and «corporeals», respectively. See N. Stephan Kinsella, «A Civil Law to Common Law Dictionary», Louisiana Law Review 54 (1994), pp. 1265-305 for further differences between civil-law and common-law terminology. The term «things» is a broad civil-law concept that refers to all types of items, whether corporeal or incorporeal, movable or immovable.

2

Эта дискуссия исходит из различного понимания понятия отчуждаемости и касается контрактного права, т.е., можем ли мы «продавать» или иным образом отчуждать наше тело в том же смысле, в каком мы