‘Was the transaction witnessed?’
Lauderback said nothing.
‘If the transaction was not witnessed, then it will be your word against his, Mr. Lauderback.’
‘It’ll be the truth against a lie!’
Gascoigne declined to answer this. He returned the contract to the envelope, and smoothed it flat over his knee.
‘It’s a set-up,’ Lauderback said. ‘I’ll take him to court. I’ll have him flayed.’
‘On what charge?’
‘False pretences, of course,’ Lauderback said. ‘Impersonation. Fraud.’
‘I’m afraid that the evidence will bear out against you.’
‘Oh—you’re afraid of that, are you?’
‘The law has no grounds to doubt this signature,’ Gascoigne said, smoothing the envelope a second time, ‘because no other documentation survives Mr. Crosbie Wells, official or otherwise, that might serve as proof of his hand.’
Lauderback opened his mouth; he seemed about to say something, but then he shut it again, shaking his head. ‘It was a set-up,’ he said. ‘It was a set-up all along!’
‘Why do you think Mr. Carver saw the need to take an alias with you?’
The politician’s answer was surprising. ‘I’ve done some digging on Carver,’ he said. ‘His father was a prominent figure in one of the British merchant trading firms—Dent & Co. You might have heard of him. William Rochfort Carver. No? Well, anyway. Some time in the early fifties he gives his son a clipper ship—the
‘And so he assumed an alias.’
‘Exactly,’ said Lauderback, sitting back.
‘I am curious to know why he only assumed an alias with
Lauderback glared at him. ‘You read the papers,’ he said. ‘Don’t make me spell it out to you. I’ve made my apology in public: I won’t do it again.’
Gascoigne inclined his head. ‘Ah,’ he said. ‘Carver assumed the alias Francis Wells in order to exploit your former entanglement with Mrs. Wells.’
‘That’s it,’ said Lauderback. ‘He said that he was Crosbie’s brother. Told me he was settling a score on Crosbie’s behalf—on account of my having made a bad woman of his wife. It was an intimidation tactic, and it worked.’
‘I see,’ said Gascoigne, wondering why Lauderback had not explained this so sensibly to Thomas Balfour two months ago.
‘Look,’ said Lauderback, ‘I’m playing straight with you, Mr. Gascoigne, and I’m telling you that the law is on my side. Carver’s break with his father is commonly known. He had a thousand provocations to assume an alias. Why, I could call in the father’s testimony, if need be. How would Carver like
‘Not very well, I should imagine.’
‘No,’ cried Lauderback. ‘Not very well at all!’
Gascoigne was annoyed by this. ‘Well, I wish you luck, Mr. Lauderback, in bringing Mr. Carver to justice,’ he said.
‘Spare the bromide,’ Lauderback snapped. ‘Talk to me plain.’
‘As you wish,’ Gascoigne said, shrugging. ‘You know without my telling you that proof of provocation is not evidence. A man cannot be convicted simply because it can be proved that he had good reason to commit the crime in question.’
Lauderback bristled. ‘Do you doubt my word?’
‘No indeed,’ said Gascoigne.
‘You just think my case is weak. You think I don’t have a leg to stand on.’
‘Yes. I think it would be very unwise to take this matter to court,’ said Gascoigne. ‘I am sorry to speak so bluntly. You have my compassion for your troubles, of course.’
But Gascoigne felt no compassion whatsoever for Alistair Lauderback. He tended to reserve that emotion for persons less privileged than himself, and although he could acknowledge that Lauderback’s current situation was pitiable, he considered the politician’s wealth and eminence to be ample consolation for whatever inconveniences the man might be encountering in the short term. In fact, enduring a spot of injustice might do Lauderback a bit of good! It might improve him as a politician, thought Gascoigne—who was, in his private adjudications at least, something of an autocrat.
‘I’ll wait for the Magistrate,’ said Lauderback. ‘He’ll see sense.’
Gascoigne tucked the envelope into his jacket, next to his cigarettes. ‘I understand that Carver is now attempting to draw down funds from your protection and indemnity scheme, in order to finance the debts that he incurred in disposing of the shipwreck.’
‘That is correct.’
‘And you wish to refuse him access to this money.’
‘Also correct.’
‘On what grounds?’
Lauderback turned very red. ‘On what grounds?’ he cried. ‘The man has stiffed me, Mr. Gascoigne! He was planning this from the outset! You’re a fool if you think I’ll take it lying down! Is that what you’re telling me? To take it lying down?’
‘Mr. Lauderback,’ Gascoigne said, ‘I do not presume to give you any kind of advice at all. What I am observing is that no laws appear to have been broken. In his letter to Mr. Garrity, Mr. Carver made it very plain that he is acting on Mr. Wells’s behalf—for Mr. Wells, as you know, is dead. To all appearances Carver is merely doing the charitable thing, in settling matters as the shipowner’s proxy, because the shipowner is not able to do the job himself. I do not see that you have any evidence to disprove this.’
‘But it’s not
‘I’m afraid that will be very difficult to prove,’ said Gascoigne.
‘Why?’ said Lauderback.
‘Because, as I have already told you, there is no proof of Crosbie Wells’s true signature,’ said Gascoigne. ‘There were no papers of any kind in his cottage, and his birth certificate and his miner’s right are nowhere to be found.’
Lauderback opened his mouth to make a retort, and again seemed to change his mind.
‘Oh,’ said Gascoigne, suddenly. ‘I’ve just thought of something.’
‘What?’ said Lauderback.
‘His marriage certificate,’ said Gascoigne. ‘That would bear his signature, would it not?’
‘Ah,’ said Lauderback. ‘Yes.’
‘But no,’ said Gascoigne, changing his mind, ‘it wouldn’t be enough: to prove a forgery of a dead man’s hand, you would need more than one example of his signature.’
‘How many would you need?’ said Lauderback.
Gascoigne shrugged. ‘I am not familiar with the law,’ he said, ‘but I would imagine that you would need