seeking for the analytical tools— rules o f discourse that are
enhanced rather than diminished by ambiguity. We value
nuance. Dogma is anathema to the spirit o f inquiry that animates
women’s biography. The notion that
propagandistic and inadequate. We want to affirm the spiritual
dignity and the sexual bonding we seek to find in women’s lives.
We want a discourse o f triumph, if you will pardon me for being
rhetorically elegant. I have heard the Grand Inquisitor Dworkin
say that, as we are women, such discourse will have to be
ambiguous. She is a prime example, o f course, o f the simple-
minded demogogue who promotes the proposition that
entertained, except, o f course, by the poor, the uneducated, the
lunatic fringe that she both exploits and appeals to. It is, for
instance, anti-mythological to perceive rape in moralistic terms
as a bad experience without transformative dimensions to it. We
would then have to ignore or impugn the myth o f Persephone,
in which her abduction and rape led, in the view o f the wise
ancient Greeks, to the establishment o f the seasons, a mythologi-
cal tribute, in fact, to the seasonal character o f the menarche. It
is disparaging and profoundly anti-intellectual to concentrate
on the virtual slave status o f women per se in ancient Greece as
if that in and o f itself rendered their mythological insights into
rape suspect. In fact, intercourse, forced or not, is the
precondition for a fertile, fruitful, multiplied as it were,
abundance o f living things, symbolized by the planting and
harvesting seasons. I am, o f course, not allying m yself either
with the right-wing endorsement o f motherhood or fam ily in
making these essentially keen, neutral, and inescapable observations. We cannot say the Greek philosophers and artists, the
storytellers and poets, were wrong, or dismiss them, simply
because some among us want to say that rape is bad or feels
bad or has some destructive effects. In fact, it has not been
scientifically proven that the effects o f rape are worse than the
effects o f gender-neutral assault and we are not willing to stew
in our stigma. As one distinguished feminist o f our own
school wrote some years ago in a left-wing journal o f
socialism, and I am paraphrasing: we should not dwell on rape
at all because to do so negatively valorizes sex; instead we
should actively concentrate on enjoying sex so that, in a sense,
the good can push out the bad; it is sex-negative to continue to
stigmatize an act, a process, an experience, that sometimes has
negative consequences; if we expand sexual pleasure we will,
in fact, be repudiating rape— in consciousness and in practice.
Further, in w om en’s academic circles we reify this perspective
by refusing, for instance, to have cross-cultural or cross-disci-
plinary discussions with those who continue to see themselves
as victims. While we deplore racism and endorse the goals o f