sorts of books in every field.

My high school library was tall, I remember, as if piles of

books held up the ceiling; it was dense with books organized

according to the Dewey decimal system. I liked to look at and

to touch the books. I believed I could feel the heat emanating

from them, and no heat meant no light. My father had told

me I had to read everything, that to read books of only one

view was the equivalent of a moral wrong. When I asked why,

he uttered the incomprehensible words: “Sometimes writers

lie.” In my early years, my parents made up for the latitude

they gave me in reading by seeing to it that I read on a continuum, both political and literary. When I went weak in the knees for Dostoyevsky, my dad gave me some Mark Twain or

my mother one of Eric Bentley’s books on the theater. I just

wanted to read everything; there was never enough. It wasn’t

quite as simple as it sounds. My mother was more tense about

what I read than my father, but then, she was in the thick of

it: my bad attitudes, bad habits, and bad behavior. I did get

ideas from books: that’s what they’re for. I’ve been astonished

by the pro-pornography argument that people are not influenced by what they read or see. Why, then, bother writing or making films? One wants to persuade. One wants to knock

the reader senseless with the shock of the new or the old

reconceived. Rimbaud articulated the writing ambition when

28

The High School Library

he wanted to derange the senses, though he meant his own.

Sometimes it’s the rawness of the writing that makes everything inside shake and break; sometimes it’s the delicacy of the writing that makes everything inside simply recognize a reality

different from the known one or experience a lyricism heretofore unknown. For me, subtle writing was almost always anti-urban; it took me to the steppes of Russia or Huck Finn*s

South.

The library brought the world to me: I went with Darwin

on the HMS Beagle and I dived with Freud into the mind and

I plot ed with Marx about how to end poverty. I had read

most of Freud, al of Darwin, and most of Marx before I graduated from high school. This was not with the help of the high school librarians.

Instead, I learned their work schedules, because we were not

allowed to take out more than two books a day and I needed

a bigger fix than that. Al records were kept by hand. So if I

went into the library during a new shift, I could get two more

books, then two more, then two more. The librarians treated

the books like contraband, and so did I. My friends and I had

a commitment to Catcher in the Rye, which was not allowed

in the library. We bought a lot of copies over time. We shelved

them. Each time it would be a different one of us who had

the responsibility for get ing the book into the library, on the

shelves. Sometimes we catalogued the book - what was gained

if no one knew it was there? - and other times we shelved it

29

Добавить отзыв
ВСЕ ОТЗЫВЫ О КНИГЕ В ИЗБРАННОЕ

0

Вы можете отметить интересные вам фрагменты текста, которые будут доступны по уникальной ссылке в адресной строке браузера.

Отметить Добавить цитату