to the devaluing of women in every part of life. The pornography itself was defined in the statute as a series of concrete scenarios in which women were sexual y subordinated to men.
In 1984 I went with a group of activists and organizers to
the convention of the National Organization for Women in
order to get NOW’s support for this new approach to fighting
pornography.
The convention was held in New Orleans in a posh hotel.
Sonia Johnson, an activist especially associated with a radical
crusade to pass the Equal Rights Amendment, was running
for president of NOW, and she sur endered her time and space
so that I could address the convention on her behalf; our
understanding was that I would talk about pornography and
the new approach MacKinnon and I had developed.
It was a hot, hot city in every sense. Leaving the hotel one
saw the trafficking in women in virtually every venue along
Bourbon Street. The whole French Quarter, and Bourbon
Street in particular, was crowded with middle-aged men in
suits roving as if in gangs, dripping sweat, going from one sex
show to the next, searching for prostitutes and strippers.
In the hotel, NOW women were herded into caucuses and
divided into cliques. I'm a member of NOW, even though its
milksop politics deeply offend me. Now I was going to try to
persuade the members that they should pursue the difficult
and dangerous task of addressing pornography as a civil rights
issue for women.
It is hard to describe how insular NOW is. It is run on the
national level by women who want to play politics with the
big boys in Washington, D. C., where NOW’s national of ice
is located. I had, over the years, spoken at ral ies and events
organized by many local NOW chapters al over the country.
On the local level, my experience with NOW was entirely
wonderful. The members were valiant women, often the sole
staf for battered women’s shelters and rape crisis centers,
often the only organized progressive group in a smal town or
city. I’ve never met better women or bet er feminists. Those
who run the nationally visible NOW are different in kind:
they stick to safe issues and mimic the politics and strategies
of professional political lobbyists.
Soon after I came back from Amsterdam, I spoke at a ral y
organized by the local NOW chapter in Washington, D. C. At
the time the burning issue was the Equal Rights Amendment,
a proposed amendment to the U. S. Constitution that would