101. Cf. the speech of August 22, 1939, Domarus, pp. 1234 f.
102. IMT XX, p. 397. Keitel declared in Nuremberg that the German offensive capacity would not even have sufficed to break through Czechoslovakia’s border fortifications; IMT X, p. 582.
103. Cf. Gilbert and Gott, pp. 144 ff.
104. See, for example, the report of the British charge d’affaires in Berlin,
105. The speech, a key document to the understanding of Hitler’s mentality, is printed in: VJHfZ 1958:2, pp. 181 ff.
106. Notes by Legation Councillor Hewel, ADAP IV, No. 228.
107. Zoller, p. 84; the following quotation is taken from the Proclamation to the German People of March 15, which had evidently been framed before the conversation with Hacha; cf. Domarus, p. 1095.
108. Quoted in Nolte,
109. Erich Kordt,
110. Sebastian Haffner,
111. C. J. Burckhardt, p. 157.
112. Thus the record of the conversation among Beck, Chamberlain, and Halifax on April 4, 1939, quoted in Freund,
113.
114. Shirer, p. 454.
115. Gisevius, p. 363.
116. Domarus, pp. 1119 ff.
117. Cf., for example, Francois-Poncet, p. 282; also Grigore Gafencu,
118. IMTXXXIV, pp. 380 ff. (120-C).
119. Shirer, p. 471; Bullock (p. 504) expresses a similar opinion.
120.
121. Quoted in Freund,
122. Notes of Embassy secretary Julius Schnurre on a conversation with Georgi Astachov, the Soviet charge d’affaires in Berlin, on May 5, 1939; cf. ADAP VI, p. 355; also notes of von Weizsacker on a conversation with Soviet Ambassador Merekalov on April 17,1939;
123. C. J. Burckhardt, p. 348. On Hitler’s hesitation and his wavering attitude, cf. p. 325 f.; also Bullock, pp. 515 f. The remark on the “pact with Satan” was made in a conference on August 28; cf. Halder,
124. ADAP VI, pp. 514 ff.
125. IMT XXXVII, pp. 546 ff.
126. C. J. Burckhardt, pp. 341 ff.
127. ADAP VI, No. 729.
128. Ernst von Weizsacker,
129. Georges Bonnet,
130. Freund, Weltgeschichte III, p. 124; here, too, p. 123, the Polish Foreign Minister’s declaration of August 23, 1939, and, p. 165, the exchange of telegrams between Ribbentrop and Hitler.
131. The Soviet judges succeeded, however, in preventing the admission of the supplementary protocol as evidence, so that it played no further part in the trial.
132. Nolte,
133. Hans-Gunther Seraphim, ed.,
134. Report of the secretary, Hencke, dated August 24, 1939, cited in Freund,
135. Hoffmann,
136. Six separate versions of this address have been preserved, each differing from the others in its stresses. Cf. the comparative analysis by Winfried Baumgart in VJHfZ 1968:2, pp. 120 ff. The version cited here is to be found in: IMT XXVI, 798-PS (first part) and 1014-PS (second part). Concerning the impression the speech made on its audience cf. Erich Raeder,
137. W. L. Shirer,
138. From notes by Sir Ivone Kirkpatrick, Sir Orme Sargent, and Lord Halifax, cited in Gilbert and Gott, pp. 320 ff.
139. Birger Dahlerus,
140. Note by Paul Schmidt concerning a conversation between Hitler and Attolico on August 31, 1939, 7 P.M., cited in Freund,
141. In the negotiations with England France expressed the desire not to begin military operations until September 4: to be precise, as Bonnet stressed to Halifax, on Monday evening; cf. M. Freund,
142. Speech of September 1, 1939, The New York
143. Schmidt,
144. Stehlin,
145. Gilbert and Gott, pp. 284 f.; see also p. 274 for the following episode.
146. IMT XV, pp. 385 f.
147. Nolte,
148. C. J. Burckhardt, p. 351.
149. Karl Donitz,
INTERPOLATION III
1.
2. Rauschning,
3. Rauschning,
4. Hillgruber,
5. Thus in a strategy conference of July 31, 1944; cf. Heiber,