Ephemeral Elements
Overlapping — but not identical to — the superheavy elements are the ephemeral elements [37]. The concept of ephemerality derives from the Greek word “ephemeros,” literally meaning “lasting only one day.” The term “ephemeral elements” is not widely used, but it is a useful concept to indicate elements for which there is no known isotope with a half-life of more than a day (hence, following the Greek meaning). In this way, we can roughly identify those elements for which the chemistry is either theoretical, or else based upon the study of individual atoms. At the time of writing, the ephemeral elements are those shown in Figure 5.9.
An isotope of dubnium, element 105, 268Db, has a half-life of 28 hours, thus dubnium is excluded from the ephemeral element list. This list may diminish if longer lived isotopes of any of these elements are synthesized. On the other hand, it will increase if elements beyond z = 118 are discovered. Confusingly, the term “ephemeral elements” has been used to describe claims for new elements that were subsequently shown to be false [38].
Figure 5.9 The ephemeral elements (at the date of writing).
Commentary
It is quite remarkable that well into the 21st century there are still disagreements on which elements fit into which categories — and the terminology. Hopefully, this chapter has provided some “food for thought.”
References
1.S. J. Hawkes, “Polonium and Astatine Are Not Semimetals,” J. Chem. Educ. 87(8), 782 (2010).
2.D-C. Sergentu et al., “Advances on the Determination of the Astatine Pourbaix Diagram: Predomination of over At− in Basic Conditions,” Chem. Eur. J. 22(9), 2964–2971 (2016).
3.R. H. Goldsmith, “Metalloids,” J. Chem. Educ. 59(6), 526–527 (1982).
4.R. E. Vernon, “Which Elements Are Metalloids?” J. Chem. Educ. 90, 1703–1707 (2013).
5.S. J. Hawkes, “Semimetallicity?” J. Chem. Educ. 78(12), 1686–1687 (2001).
6.L. Stein, “New Evidence That Radon Is a Metalloid Element: Ion-Exchange Reactions of Cationic Radon,” J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1631–1632 (1985).
7.C. A. Krause, “The Amphoteric Elements and Their Derivatives: Some of Their Physical and Chemical Properties,” J. Chem. Educ. 8(11), 2126–2137 (1931).
8.F. Habashi, “Metals: Typical and Less Typical, Transition and Inner Transition,” Found. Chem. 12, 31–39 (2010).
9.P. P. Edwards and M. J. Sienko, “On the Occurrence of Metallic Character in the Periodic Table of the Elements,” J. Chem. Educ. 60(9), 691–696 (1983).
10.W. B. Jensen, “The Origin of the Metallic Bond,” J. Chem. Educ. 86(3), 278–279 (2009).
11.J. J. Gilman, “In Defense of the Metallic Bond,” J. Chem. Educ. 76(10), 1330–1331 (1999).
12.R. T. Myers, “Physical and Chemical Properties and Bonding of Metallic Elements,” J. Chem. Educ. 56(11), 712–713 (1979).
13.S. J. Hawkes, “Conductivity,” J. Chem. Educ. 86(4), 431 (2009).
14.R. J. Gillespie and E. A. Robinson, “Gilbert N. Lewis and the Chemical Bond: The Electron Pair and the Octet Rule from 1916 to the Present Day,” J. Comput. Chem. 28(1), 87–97 (2007).
15.W. Grochala, “Atypical Compounds of Gases, Which Have Been Called ‘Noble’,” Chem. Soc. Revs. 36(10), 1632–1655 (2007).
16.C. S. Nash, “Atomic and Molecular Properties of Elements 112, 114, and 118,” J. Phys. Chem. A 109(15), 3493–3500 (2005).
17.X. Dong et al., “A Stable Compound of Helium and Sodium at High Pressure,” Nat. Chem. 9, 440–445 (2017).
18.R. M. Noyes, “Some Predicted Chemistry of Group VIII Elements; the Aerogens,” J. Am. Chem. Soc. 85, 22-02-2204 (1963).
19.A. Bauzá and A. Frontera, “Aerogen Bonding Interaction: A New Supramolecular Force?” Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54(25), 7340–7343 (2015).
20.W. B. Jensen, “A Note on the Term ‘Chalcogen’,” J. Chem. Educ. 74(9), 1063–1064 (1997).
21.W. Fischer, “A Second Note on the Term ‘Chalcogen’,” J. Chem. Educ. 78(10), 1333 (2001).
22.F. A. Devillanova, Handbook of Chalcogen Chemistry: New Perspectives in Sulfur, Selenium and Tellurium, Royal Society of Chemistry, London (2006).
23.V. Goldschmidt, “The Principles of Distribution of Chemical Elements in Minerals and Rocks. The Seventh Hugo Müller Lecture, Delivered before the Chemical Society,” J. Chem. Soc. 655–673 (1937).
24.G. S. Girolami, “Origin of the Terms Pnictogen and Pnictide,” J. Chem. Educ. 86(10), 1200–1201.
25.International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry, Nomenclature of Inorganic Chemistry, Definitive Rules 1970, 2nd ed., Butterworths, London, 11, Section 1.2.1 (1970).
26.W. C. Fernelius, K. Loening, and R. M. Adams, “Notes on Nomenclature,” J. Chem. Educ. 48(11), 730–731 (1971).
27.L. Brammera, “Halogen Bonding, Chalcogen Bonding, Pnictogen Bonding, Tetrel Bonding: Origins, Current Status and Discussion,” Faraday Discuss. 203, 485–507 (2017).
28.P. Metrangolo and G. Resnati, “Categorizing Chalcogen, Pnictogen, and Tetrel Bonds, and Other Interactions Involving Groups 14–16 Elements,” Chem. Int. 38(6), 20–22 (Nov–Dec. 2016).
29.J. H. Duffus, “‘Heavy Metals’ a Meaningless Term? (IUPAC Technical Report),” Pure Appl. Chem. 74(5), 793–807 (2002).
30.S. J. Hawkes, “What Is a ‘Heavy Metal’?” J. Chem. Educ. 74(11), 1374 (1997).
31.S. A. Cotton and F. A. Hart, The Heavy Transition Elements, John Wiley, New York (1975).
32.S. Seidel and K. Seppelt, “Xenon as a Complex Ligand: The Tetra Xenono Gold(II) Cation in AuXe42+(Sb2F11−)2,” Science 290(5489), 117–118 (2000).
33.I-C Huang et al., “Gold(I) and Mercury(II) Xenon Complexes,” Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 42, 4392–4395 (2003).
34.M. S. Wickleder and C. Logemann, “2.18 New Chemistry of Noble Metals,” in: Comprehensive Inorganic Chemistry II, vol. 2, 2nd ed., Elsevier, New York, 491–509 (2013).
35.G. Restrepo, “Challenges for the Periodic Systems of Elements: Chemical, Historical and Mathematical Perspectives,” Chem. Eur. J. 25, 15430–15440 (2019).
36.S. Hofmann et al., “On the Discovery of New Elements (IUPAC/IUPAP Provisional Report),” Pure Appl. Chem. 90(11), 1773–1832 (2018).
37.M. W. Browne, “Scientists Meet Analytical Challenge of an Ephemeral Element,” New York Times, Section C, 3 (8 July 1997).
38.M. Francl, “Ephemeral Elements,” Nat. Chem. 11, 2–4 (2019).
Chapter 6
Isoelectronicity
Isoelectronicity is a concept widely used in chemistry — or often misused. It is difficult to think of a more ambiguous term. This chapter commences with a summary of the various ways in which isoelectronic has been used, together with the modifiers that have been applied to delineate its meaning in a specific context. After providing a consistent series of definitions, the richness of isoelectronic relationships, in all their forms, will be explored.
The term isoelectronic is ubiquitous in chemistry. But what precisely does a writer mean when
