Feit wrote that he also went to the secretary at the Edinburg church on the morning of March 23 asking for a bandage for the injury. Feit said, 'She asked me how I hurt my finger, and I said I hurt it in the mimeograph machine.'
Father Houlahan, in his statement, said that Feit came to him later in the week regarding his wounded finger.
And a secretary at the church in Edinburg was adamant in her statement that Feit came the morning after the Guerra attack asking for a bandage. And she was vocal in her suspicion that her mimeograph machine could not have done the damage to Feit's finger.
That secretary, Cleotilde 'Tilly' Sanchez, still lives in the McAllen area.And she says she still vividly remembers the events of March and April I960.
She remembers walking in as the church's other secretary, Leonila Sanchez, was putting iodine on Feit's finger.
'I didn't just ask Feit what happened to his finger,' she tells New Times. 'I asked, 'Who bit your finger?' It had teeth marks on it. It was as clear as day.
'Feit said, 'It isn't a bite.' I said,'Well, it sure looks like a bite.You can see the mouth shape on it.' '
Sanchez says she had come to know Feit well during that spring. Feit was often over visiting Moran. Feit, she says, was always calling the church asking for Moran or for help with some issue.
'Pretty early on, [Feit] wouldn't have to say his name when he called,' she says. 'His voice was that distinctive, and he was calling that much.'
In late April or early May of that year, after Irene Garza's body was found, after Sanchez had made her statements to police, a call came into the church that chills her to this day.
'It was a Friday,' she says. 'The phone rings, I pick it up and a man says,'You're next,Tilly.' I said,'What?'And he says,'You're next!'
'It was Feit,' she maintains. 'I knew his voice immediately. Father Moran walks in, and I tell him Father Feit just called and said, 'You're next,' and Father Moran just says,'Oh, Tilly, it couldn't be Father Feit.' By that point I was just scared to death.'
She quit her secretary job soon after.
Investigators were confident they had an ironclad case against John Feit in the Garza killing.
But they held off pushing for charges. They wanted to have something to offer Feit.
The deal they came up with was this: If Feit would confess to Irene Garza's murder, they wouldn't bring a charge in the Guerra case. He wouldn't have to face two trials.
In reality, it wasn't a very big carrot. Avoid an assault-related charge by confessing to rape and murder?
Feit refused to confess that he killed Irene Garza. In the summer of 1960, Feit was charged with the attempted sexual assault of Maria America Guerra.
Even without a confession, though, investigators felt confident they had more than enough evidence to charge John Feit with the murder of Irene Garza.
That never happened.
On May 3, I960, two weeks after Irene Garza disappeared, police asked John Feit to give a sworn statement of his whereabouts on Easter weekend.
At 7:00 p.m. on the Saturday before Easter, he told authorities, he and Father O'Brien were leaving the rectory heading for the church when the phone rang.
Feit said he returned to the rectory to answer it.
He said a woman was on the line asking to see Father Junius, who was already taking confessions in the church.
Feit said he told the woman that Father Junius would be busy until 10:30 p.m., but that he could talk to her if she hurried down to the church.
Irene Garza, whom Feit says he didn't know, arrived five minutes later.
'She was a light-complected girl, apparently of Latin American extraction-good-looking. She spoke perfect English,' he told police.
'For ten minutes she discussed a personal problem of hers with me, the nature of which I do not feel justified in making public since it involved my obligation of professional secrecy as a clergyman and Catholic priest.'
However, Feit did let on that the issue wasn't too serious.
'Her overall attitude and comportment during our brief conversation led me to believe that she possessed a very delicate conscience.'
Feit said he sent Garza to the church so she could go to confession.
Feit said he left the rectory, locked the door behind him, and headed to the church to help the other three priests give confession.
Feit said he last saw Garza 'standing on the sidewalk, in front of the church, arranging a scarf or handkerchief on her head.'
At 8:00 p.m., Feit said he left the church for a short break. He saw Father O'Brien talking to some men outside the church. He went to O'Brien and asked for the keys to the rectory.
From this point on, Feit's story begins to differ from the evidence and the statements of witnesses.
He said he returned to the church at 8:15 p.m. He said he left the church again at 9:00 p.m. to go to the rectory 'because my voice was beginning to give out.' There, he said, he had a cigarette and a 7UP and returned to the church to give confession.
However, a host of witnesses within the church said Father Feit's confessional line stopped moving about 8:00 p.m. As Father O'Brien later told police, that was a sign there was no priest in the confession booth.
Feit said that at 9:50 p.m., near the end of confession, a screw in his eyeglasses came loose and fell out. He told Father Busch that he would have to go to the pastoral house in San Juan to get his other pair of glasses.
The next day, O'Brien and the other priests noticed that Feit's hand was injured.
Feit explained that injury away:
'Upon arriving at the Pastoral House in San Juan, I found all the doors on the ground floor locked.' So he said he placed a wood barricade against the building and climbed up and through a second-story window.
'While entering the house in this way, I scraped the back of my right hand slightly, and the index finger and middle finger of my left hand more severely on the brick wall.'
He said he changed clothes and headed back to McAllen for the 11:00 p.m. service.
He said he went to bed at 1:00 a.m. with a 'severe headache,' which he assumed was caused by his second pair of glasses. He said the spectacles 'never fit me as well as the first' pair.
The next morning, Feit gave Mass at 9:00 a.m., then asked Fathers Busch and O'Brien if he could use Busch's car to go to San Juan to get his glasses fixed.
Feit said he worked on the glasses 'for five minutes,' but had no luck.Then, he said,'I drove straight back to Sacred Heart Church.'
At 12:40 p.m., he asked another priest to drive him to the Pastoral House in San Juan, where he said he stayed until about 4:00 p.m.
He returned to Sacred Heart to give 5:30 Mass. Shortly after 7:30 p.m. on Easter Sunday, he said, he was given a ride back to the Pastoral House by Father O'Brien.
Feit said he immediately realized he had left some of his belongings at Sacred Heart, so he borrowed a car and drove back to the church.
There, he said, several priests were talking about the 'missing girl.' As he stood there, the phone rang. Father Junius answered. It was Irene Garza's parents wanting to speak with the priest who had spoken with her the night before.
The parents came over, and Feit said he spoke with them. He said they asked him if he 'had perhaps said anything which might have upset or disturbed their daughter.'
In fact, Garza family members say, Nick Garza asked Feit,'What have you done with my daughter?'
Feit said, 'I could see the parents were very disturbed and upset themselves, so I sent them home as quickly and as quietly as possible.
'I then picked up my coat, collar, and laundry and headed for home. It was about 9:15 p.m. But I did not go straight home. My talk with the girl's parents had disturbed me. Perhaps I had said something, unintentionally, that might have upset that girl? I was worried, and drove around aimlessly for a while.'
He said he stopped at a nearby Whataburger, got a malt, then drove back to San Juan in time for the 10:00 p.m. news.
According to investigators, Irene Garza's body was probably thrown into the canal on Easter Sunday evening.
Several dozen young men were considered potential suspects early in the investigation of Irene Garza's death.
One by one, all proved to have credible alibis. And all passed lie-detector tests administered by state police investigators from Austin.
All except John Feit.
Nobody could vouch for Feit's whereabouts at critical times during the weekend. And time after time, Feit attempted to control his breathing as critical questions were asked during the polygraph examinations.
A lengthy report detailing the exams by Texas authorities, then by John Reid-arguably the top polygraph examiner in the country at the time-paints an ugly picture of Feit.
The tests 'definitely implicated him in both crimes,' the report said.
'It is the opinion of the examiner, based on this subject's polygraph test, that [Feit] is purposefully attempting to defeat the recordings.'
In fact, each time Feit was hooked up to a polygraph machine, he began taking exactly ten breaths per minute, 'indicating that he was purposefully controlling his breathing even though he had been given warnings and instructions throughout.'
Examiners secretly monitored Feit's breathing rate during normal conversations. On average, they said, he inhaled and exhaled 16 to 20 times a minute when he didn't believe he was being monitored.
Reid went on to describe Feit's demeanor throughout the tests.
'The examiner pointed out in detail to the subject that he should make an effort to tell the truth concerning his implication in these crimes so that the church and the priesthood would not suffer when evidence definitely implicating him is turned up at a later date.
'The subject, in very deliberate and explicit words, stated there will never be any evidence turning up in the future of this case.
'He also pointed out to the examiner that there are two… murders in the area [that] had gone unsolved, one for 15 years and one for 20 years, and that this case, like those, will soon be forgotten.'
When asked why he entered the priesthood, Feit answered, 'I just wanted to give it a try.'
When asked about the attack on Maria America Guerra, Feit's answers bordered on the absurd. At one point, he claimed that Guerra's true attacker had actually confessed to him.
'The subject was queried as to where the confession was obtained, and [Feit] told the examiner that it was not in the confessional box, not in the rectory but out in the open some place and was very vague as to where the open place was.'
When asked if the lie detector was incorrect when it indicated that he committed these crimes, he answered, 'Your machine is probably functioning correctly, but these men from Austin have told me that I have a vague respiration and a bad heart.'
What everyone knew-Feit's attorneys, the examiners them-selves-was that polygraph exams weren't admissible in court.
In effect, the stated belief by examiners that Feit was 'concealing the truth' would mean nothing in a courtroom.
Feit had been taken to Austin and then Chicago for the polygraph tests.
Each time, he was escorted by Father Joseph O'Brien, his supervisor at Sacred Heart Church.
It was clear that O'Brien had been placed in charge of Feit by his superiors within the Order of Mary Immaculate.
Prosecutors finally decided to first move forward with the attempted sexual assault case against Feit.
