after Cannon’s death. Cannon made the following observation:
It is true we engage in fierce combat, we are often intense partisans, sometimes we are unfair, not infrequently unjust, brutal at times, and yet I venture to say that, taken as a whole, the House is sound at heart; nowhere else will you find such a ready appreciation of merit and character, in few gatherings of equal size is there so little jealousy and envy. The House must be considerate of the feelings of its Members; there is a certain courtesy that has to be observed; a man may be voted a bore or shunned as a pest, and yet he must be accorded the rights to which he is entitled by virtue of being a representative of the people. On the other hand, a man may be universally popular, a good fellow, amusing and yet with these engaging qualities never get far. The men who have led the House, whose names have become a splendid tradition to their successors, have gained prominence not through luck or by mere accident. They have had ability, at least in some degree; but more than that, they have had character.
26.
Staff report,
27.
Lou Dubose, “The Man with the Plan,”
28.
See
29.
Spencer Overton, “Stealing Liberty: How Politicians Manipulate the Electorate,”
30.
Dan Eggen, “Justice Staff Saw Texas Districting as Illegal; Voting Rights Finding on Map Pushed by DeLay Was Overruled,”
31.
Juliet Eilperin, “House GOP Practices Art of One-Vote Victories,”
32.
Dubose and Reid,
33.
See Robert K. Murray,
34.
Jaun Williams, “The K Street Project and Jack Abramoff,”
35.
Jonathan E. Kaplan, “Boehner Can Rely on K Street Cabinet,”
36.
William Norman Grigg, “Trouble with DeLay,”
37.
John B. Judis, “Razing McCain,”
38.
Dubose and Reid,
39.
Sam Rosenfeld, “Then Came the Hammer,”
40.
Jonathan Alter, “Tom DeLay’s House of Shame,”
41.
Story reported by the American Progress Action Fund (January 20, 2006) at http://www.americanprogressaction.org/site/apps/nl/content2.asp?c=klL WJcP7H&b=1331575&ct=1799805.
42.