ZetaTalk: Being Human

ZetaTalk: Independent Thinking

Note: written on Jan 15, 1997

Students who think for themselves are on the right track, when they grope into areas that are not discussed or presented

in school as they sense that they are only being given part of the picture, when they reject rigid explanations they have been given of how things work, or explanations that were based on only part of the puzzle and not the whole. This can

never be wrong, but they are treated otherwise. The student is expected to accept the rigid explanation and toss away

any new pieces of the puzzle they discover because it upsets the rigid explanation. Thus the anger of professors when

they are asked questions that seem to counter or contradict the going theory. In truth, more bright students, the thinking type, leave school than stay in, and those that stay in are in pain.

Where most humans like to think of themselves as intelligent creatures, and even the only such creature so gifted in God's creation, they are more often willing to accept the conclusions of others than to think for themselves. This is

because emotionally they are children. Look to the discussion on why the planets continue to revolve as an example.

It's Newton's law. Once motion starts it continues unless stopped. When there is obvious contradiction to this so-called

law, which in fact is not law but only describes behavior, the children are discombobulated. It is not that Newton

cannot be challenged, it's that the children cannot think for themselves.

Look about you, at how small children deal with the complexities of life. They ask their parents to explain, and

whatever reason is given out becomes the answer, is repeated to other children, and is angrily defended. The child

needs the parent there to explain matters, and the emotional overtone of desperation overrides any capacity for logical thought the child may possess. Having been raised to the level of gods, the parents can do no wrong, until adolescence

arrives and new gods are clung to with the same desperation - gang leaders, movie stars, athletes. Most adult humans,

grownup on the outside only, are still children on the inside, clinging to whomever acts like a self-proclaimed god by

either claiming to take care of the adult child or claiming to have the answers.

Scientific principles, once stated by such a god, are not allowed to be challenged unless this is done by another god.

No matter how illogical the scientific principle becomes, the precepts of the religion are repeated mindlessly, and any

challenge to this devotion meets hostility. How dare you challenge the god's laws! This tendency to behave as a

mindless child is most dramatized in scientific communities, where logic and the ability to think matters through is

assumed. In stark contrast to what humans expect from their scientists, the adult child prates the laws of their gods and refuses to put obvious contradictions alongside of these laws. They look the other way. They throw insults. They walk

off in a huff. Anything but be forced to grow up and think for themselves!

All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com

http://www.zetatalk2.com/beinghum/b68.htm[2/5/2012 1:28:10 PM]

ZetaTalk: Context

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Context

Note: writen during the May 25, 2002 Live ZetaTalk IRC Session

When the giant comet positions itself exactly between the Earth and its Sun, things change. The Earth then

has its greatest advocate for its previous alignment, the Sun and its magnetic alignment, negated. The

Earth hears only the magnetic voice of the giant comet, so to speak, which stands between the Earth and

its former magnetic commander, the Sun.

ZetaTalk: Pole Shift

When approaching the point of passage, the shift suddenly happens, and this is before the point when ...

Planet X is actually between the Earth and Sun. After the passage, Planet X exits as quickly as it

approach.

ZetaTalk: Stop Rotation (May 18, 2002 Addition)

The sticking point is the use of the word exactly in the Pole Shift write-up, in 1995, when more detail given that same year explains the angle and position and distance such that exactly between the Earth and Sun do not seem appropriate.

The one write-up was an overview, focusing on what occurs on earth during the shift, and why it happens (magnetic alignment) and the others were focusing on positions between the planets and Sun. If one goes to the store, for

groceries, and Mother says 'Father will be right back, he went shopping', and then Father does not come back for an hour as he also gassed up the car and chatted with a neighbor, does this make Mother a liar? Her point was, he will be

back, soon, and she felt no need to explain all possible diversions he might make. If Mother is approached by a cop, explaining that her husband is in danger of being shot as a kook with a gun has issued a death threat, her answer would

not be in that context. She would then state that he went shopping and give the address of the grocery. She would also list all possible side trips or activities he might make. She would provide addresses, phone numbers, details on what he

was wearing, the license plate number, and color of car. Is there a difference in the context, the focus, in these two settings? Yes!

All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com

http://www.zetatalk2.com/beinghum/b91.htm[2/5/2012 1:28:11 PM]

ZetaTalk: Event Timing

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Event Timing

Note: writen during the May 25, 2002 Live ZetaTalk IRC Session

On a live radio show with New York this past year, there were questions about the missing Congressmans