It doesn’t, and then they are left with even fewer outlets for their sexual frustrations, as now they have the guilt of wanting to leave the priesthood or nun’s vows.
What results is silly behavior, the equivalent of the schizophrenic twiddling their fingers, aimless motions and random speech. Speaking in tongues or dancing in circles is nothing more than an outlet, the equivalent of a cold shower or
long run but with some added benefits - the practitioner has an orgasm. The church allows this form of masturbation,
giving oneself over into antics that incite an orgasm, as it is presented as
church setting and what do you see?
http://www.zetatalk2.com/myths/m52.htm[2/5/2012 1:34:05 PM]
ZetaTalk: Angels
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
There has been much confusion about angels, who are regularly shown in the Christian religion as wearing flowing
white gowns and having wings and haloes. There is no such creature, or at least no creature that looks like this,
although there are entities that operate in the manner ascribed to angels. This myth sprang up during the early Christian era in response to humans in the traditional garb of that day seen floating. The robes, wafting in the wind, appeared as wings. The sunlight, reflecting off their oily hair, which in those days was never truly washed, appeared as haloes.
Angels.
How did these humans come to be floated, in plain sight of other humans, when today levitation done by ourselves or
others is registered only in the subconscious? Repression of memory is a factor of the fear and anxiety of the
populace. We do nothing that will increase this fear and anxiety. If the observer can view the scene and incorporate
startling views without alarm, this is allowed. In the old days, where people were more accepting of magical
happenings, this was the case. Today, people are more scientific, and realize they are dealing with something outside
the frame of reference. Panic lies just under the surface, and the Awakening is paced with this in consideration.
Because these humans were close to Jesus, part of his entourage in fact, they were assumed to be close to God. The
typical response to any relatively unknown phenomenon clicked in - fill in the blanks. Thus we have stories of how the angels came to be, fallen angels, ranks of angels, and variations on their appearance, their personalities, and exploits of angels that grew every time they were retold. There are merely spirits, and such descriptions of angels is a way of
describing good and evil, the compassion and pulling toward others that characterizes those in the Service- to-Others,
or the pulling toward the self characteristic of those in the Service-to-Self. There are angels among humans who have
never left this Earth. They think of others intensely. They sacrifice themselves. Are these not angels?
http://www.zetatalk2.com/myths/m31.htm[2/5/2012 1:34:05 PM]
ZetaTalk: Adam and Eve
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
The myth that mankind was once pure in innocence or fell due to awareness of their sexuality is utter nonsense. The
myth makes no sense at all, other than in the context of sexual repression. Is Christianity about sexual repression? To a great extent, yes, as control over the sexual practices of the flock gives the religious elite great leverage. The sex drive is constant and strong, and when the flock is made to feel guilty about this and tries to buy out from under any
impending punishment, this in turn makes the religious elite rich. This is the crux of Catholicism. Anyone who doubts
this need only listen to the lectures given school children in Catholic schools and to the anguish poured forth in
confessionals. We listen to both, and we know. Why was this nonsense about Adam and Eve perpetrated? Early man
had some sense that they were genetically engineered, having seen their makers, and passed this along in myth and
legend. Early Christians adopted this legend and changed it to suit their needs. End of story.
http://www.zetatalk2.com/myths/m32.htm[2/5/2012 1:34:06 PM]
ZetaTalk: Creation
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
The Bible, as a guided book, attempted to explain the evolution of mankind in terms that humans could understand.
Realize that in the day and age that the Bible was written, such matters as planets orbiting around a Sun, evolution in response to adaptations or genetic mutations, and such theories as the Big Bang did not exist. Man saw the Sun rise
and set, seeded his crops or tended his herds, and hoped to raise his children before old age took him out. How would
one explain evolution and genetic engineering to such a man? Simply, and with a tale they could relate to.
Such a tale was the creation tale. Since God is acknowledged by all, God caused all this to happen, ultimately. Since
the stages on any planet that ultimately sustain life are basically the lifeless planet in darkness, the form and the void, and then the light, as in let there be light, and then the waters, as condensation happens as a planets cools, and then the plants, as without vegetation there can be no mobile animals, and then the fish in the sea, as all life first evolves from a watery womb, and then the creeping creatures that leave the waters followed by land animals and flying creatures, and
lastly intelligent species such as man. This tale was not meant to be literal, but was meant to explain the
