ZetaTalk: Orientation

as they try to remain calm while chirping stewardesses serve them drinks. These endeavors often have a long learning curve, and

man as a creature of limited intelligence, being only on the first rung of the evolutionary ladder, will not arrive where he wants to be on any of these endeavors, in his current limited stated. This is by design, as given his immature spiritual state, he would wreck havoc by being able to do more than tinker, and hope.

Where is man going awry in his tinkering? First, as a base, man should realize that genetic engineering has already been done, by nature, during evolution. Some of the things man struggles with, some of his diseases, are in fact

protections from other problems, genetically selected to be passed forward only because they were of benefit in prior ages. The ability to pack food around one's middle in the form of fat, a buffer against starvation. This was of course

balanced in the past by times of food shortage, the fat dropped. Man was not intended to be perpetually pudgy. High

cholesterol or high blood pressure is an advantage when one has to fight a tiger or bear with naught but a knife or

stone, or run like hell to escape. This was of course balanced in the past by a period of tranquility, unlike what modern man faces in his daily battles with tension in the work place, the figurative tiger never dispelled. Even diabetes,

developing later in life by the chubby and inactive, has a genetically selected advantage. The ancestors of those who

did not develop diabetes during times of plenty, when early man had naught to do but sit in the berry fields or by streams overflowing with fish, were easy prey for predators, as they gained weight endlessly, huge toads that could not waddle away. Diabetes, type II, resists an intake of sugar by the cells and forces the body to lose weight, at a horrific rate, then lifts when the human is again slim.

Nature has evolved food crops that man fosters to resist insects, and to produce seeds such as grain and tubers such as carrots and potatoes far in excess of what the plant in nature requires to propagate itself. Plants that do so are already engineered, by nature, to be productive or those parts that creatures eat, as unless the plant does so, rodents and bugs will consume them and the plant will not reproduce itself. The natural process that these plants are using should be

enhanced. But something different is afoot, among humankind, who have motives other than increased productivity.

They seek control of the entire food production and distribution process, and by this, control over mankind, who will

http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta244.htm[2/5/2012 11:21:53 AM]

ZetaTalk: Genetic Engineering

thus become slaves, or so they hope. It is certainly no secret that Monsanto, in partnership with the USDA, has created and tried to enforce what is termed the terminator gene, which prevents a hybrid plant from reproducing itself. No need for Monsanto to insist on contracts with farmers that require them to return, year after year, for more seed. The

farmer cannot save seed to avoid this, as the seed would be no good, and not germinate. This plan met with such an uproar that it did not move forward, but has stalled. Nevertheless, the mindset of those doing genetic tinkering with

crops can be seen.

If they do not care about causing mankind, those too poor to buy seed, from starving, how much would they care about

the overall effect of the crops they are producing? If they get a stronger yield, they push their coercive tactics and

contracts, using the stronger yield as an excuse. Of course, any safety measures, any results of such safety checks, are ignored and kept out of the media. This likewise has not passed unnoticed, nor without objection, around the world.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta244.htm[2/5/2012 11:21:53 AM]

ZetaTalk: Conservatives

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Conservatives

written Apr 29, 2004

How do the Zetas define the relationship between political dichotomy, ie conservative vs

liberal, and the spiritual orientations of STS and STO. What are the likely changes that will

occur in the makeup of the two major political parties in the USA and governments through

the world as the Transformation proceeds.

However the political parties around the world are described, they seem to fall into categories that define the spiritual orientations, Service-to-Self or Service-to-Other.

What are the characteristics of Service-to-Self? They want control over others, a clear pecking order so that

whatever status they have achieved cannot be challenged, and they want this status conserved. Since they aspire to be at the top of the pile, they want this pile conserved, not altered, and protecting the spoils of the rich is thus a precept of their philosophy. What is missing in this equation is the conservation of comfort and security for the

common man, who must be sharply punished if they challenge the status quo and especially if they rebel and are

thus out of control of the conservatives seeking to maintain the status quo. The status quo disempowers the

common man, who is so exhausted from trying to feed and house a family they have scarce energy to protest,

who can be threatened with being thrown out on the street with no recourse if they protest or are reluctant to be

under strict control in all aspects of their lives.

What are the characteristics of the Service-to-Other? They are concerned about the well being of the least

among the populace, welfare and health benefit programs, a fair distribution of the wealth accumulated from the

work the common man is invariably bound to on a daily basis, and open access to facts. They are liberal with the distribution of accumulated wealth, and stand for liberty or freedom of access to information and services. This pits them at odds to their counterparts, who oppose freedom while seeking to establish control over the common

man, and demand accumulation of wealth for the few.

How will the parties align during the coming pole shift precursors, and during the shift and in the Aftertime? Expect

those with wealth to be shrill during devaluation, demanding taxpayer supported protection for their assets to be the

priority over any assistance to the homeless - guard against looting warehouses, back insurance settlements, and ignore the homeless. If unable to secure their assets during the shift, they will be shrill and aggressive in trying