ZetaTalk: Pole Shift

The melting

will occur faster than the reforming, as for ice to form there are more factors at play than for ice to melt. We will

explain. The ice over the former poles will now be facing the Sun, and the melt rate will proceed based on the air

temperature and the absorption of solar rays, both of which will be high as the old poles will now be situated

essentially at the new equator. Any water at the new poles will freeze, but the buildup of ice on a pole is not altogether

from the water that happened to be there when the pole took position. The buildup comes from precipitation, and this

accumulates over hundreds of years. At some point an equilibrium is established, with icebergs breaking off and

floating to warmer waters and the like. The Earth, therefore, will experience More Water in its oceans for some time

after the cataclysms.

Where new poles take centuries to fully form, existing poles thrust under an equatorial sun melt rapidly. The melting

poles will thus raise the sea level, worldwide, by 650 to 700 feet within two years. Survivors living below this level

will find themselves moving repeatedly as rivers begin to overflow their banks and marsh areas become lakes. Those

planning survival sites should consider this as well as escape routes for survivors who might be trapped by the rising

water. Survival sites should be selected for their ability to link to other land areas that will be above the water line as

well, so that technologies and skills can be shared among the survivors. Survivors thus will find visiting each other

possible rather than impossible in a new world without maps and certainly without guidelines for boats setting out on

what will seem to be an endless sea.

Going on the assumption that the poles have always been, essentially, where they are found today, humans have

extracted core samples which they assume will be a frozen record of climatic changes back through the eons - a dust

layer here, bits of vegetation there, a higher carbon dioxide level here, and on through any number of variables.

However, unlike the rings in a tree, which show its age, layers of ice do not show what is absent. The tree trunk is

viewed as a whole, reflecting the life of a tree, but polar ice reflects only that portion of its life that has not melted

away. Many shifts are slight, thus causing partial melting or melting on only one side. Thus, for the existing poles,

there are places where the debris and gasses caught in the ice tell a long tale.

All rights reserved: [email protected]

http://www.zetatalk2.com/poleshft/p30.htm[2/5/2012 9:55:42 AM]

ZetaTalk: Rising Seas

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Rising Seas

Note: below taken from the Melting Ice Caps page.

It has been estimated by mankind’s scientists that the melting, completely, of the Antarctic ice would cause the oceans

of the world to rise in sea level by 200 feet. This is measuring the effect of ice above the water line melting and

returning to the body of water, and leveling out. More occurs during and for some time after the shift when the existing

poles are placed under the equatorial sun and all active volcanoes of the world explode. What degree of heat would be

generated by the crust and core separating and the core moving under the crust? How much heat is required to melt

rock, during rapid subduction of one plate over another, which the Indians of the West Coast and witnesses of the last

pole shift in the Middle East report? How rapidly does heat dissipate, even from campfire ashes, open to the air, or the

seat of a chair from which the occupant recently rose? Most of the surface of the Earth is covered by the great oceans,

which warm completely, without cold spots, after the shift, and do not return to having cold spots until some centuries

have passed. This warmer water accounts for the rise in sea level, in the main.

Note: below added during the October 5, 2002 Live ZetaTalk IRC Session.

The oceans of the world are mostly a vast unexplored territory to man, who cannot drop to their depths else be

crushed, nor explore them at length when descending at all. The depth of rifts is calculated by radar, and the

temperatures estimated by probes. What can be assumed is that the water is not freezing, else would form into ice and

rise to the top. But water can be at the freezing temperature, and not freeze, if kept in motion, as flowing rivers in the

cold of winter give evidence. In computing the rise in the seas to 675 feet, more than the melting of Antarctic and

Greenland ice is presumed, as this rise has been computed by man to be only 200 feet. Since the water flowing from

the pole is cold, and would drop and run along the deep ocean rifts, this would bring those rifts to the freezing point,

cold water falling below warm. How high does that cold water rise? Human statistics measure the temperature at

various depths, so this is a known statistic. What is the volume of water in the deep rifts, vs water at more shallow

depths? This is also statistically evident, as the oceans have been mapped by radar. Nevertheless, in considering that

the temperature worldwide, at all depths, might rise to the level of the surface waters at the Equator, the math does not

compute.

What is missing from this equation is swelling of land masses, land surface under the water, as odd as this concept

might sound. Metal is known to expand when heated, but the concept of hot mud being