ZetaTalk: Science

ZetaTalk: Explosions

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Explosions

Note: written on Mar 15, 1997.

Humans are most aware of atoms bonding due to the sharing of electrons, but bonding due to sharing of the many

other subatomic particles on the move around the periphery of the atom also occur. During explosions, a bonding

process begins and does not end until an equilibrium is established. The addition of heat to spark an explosion or

compression both result in the same atomic drama - heat particles and other subatomic particles flood a given atom in

excess of what the surrounding areas contain, and these particles go on the move. At the point where this wave of

motion is traveling outward, a temporary liquidity of atoms is created, as the heat particles form a type of lubricant, so

the atoms have mobility beyond their prior state.

Suddenly freed from the prior bonding, atoms on the edge of the wave find themselves free to form new bonds, which

they do in accordance with their chemical nature, i.e. their ability to hold subatomic particles such as electrons based

on the weight and composition of the nucleus. This new bonding results in excess heat particles, which now do not

have room due to the new bonding arrangement, and the explosion process is acerbated. Where the new bonding has

been facilitated by the lubrication factor of excess heat, heat particles are not the dominant factor in the new bonding.

Other subatomic particles, such as electrons, dominate and dictate the bonding process.

If the chemical mix is such that this re-bonding is just waiting to happen, inhibited only due to the strength of the prior bonds, then it is, as you say, an explosive mixture. This is why certain chemicals or chemical mixes are handled with

care, and others are not deemed capable of engaging in an explosion. Those chemical mixes that result in an explosion

even without the addition of heat or compression are a mixture of atoms prone to many bonding combinations. They

enter the explosion bonding in a manner that is less stable than the new potential bond, which they rapidly migrate to,

causing the familiar release of heat and light particles.

All rights reserved: [email protected]

http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s93.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:59 AM]

ZetaTalk: Subatomic Particles

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Subatomic Particles

Note: written by Jul 15, 1995.

At one point in the not too distant past humans thought of matter as a substance, like wood, water, air, or sand.

Common folk, of course, deal with matter in this way still. In addition to matter, there was energy, like light or radio

waves. Theoretical physicists concluded, based on the observable and measurable chemical, electromagnetic, and

fractal qualities of matter, that an atomic structure existed. In those days the concept was simple, involving an atomic

nucleus with orbiting electrons, but the concept has rapidly evolved to include dozens of theoretical subatomic

particles, and since Einstein's theories have become acceptable, the concept of energy as being, in fact, just rapidly

moving small bits of matter.

How close are the many theories of man to the Zeta understanding? In concept, humans are on the right track, but in

detail they are not yet half right. For instance, humans are searching for a quark, a particle that would make their

formulas work, where no such particle exists. The fault is in the formulas, not in the elusive quark. The formulas to be

made whole by the elusive quark have invented the quark, which takes shape only to fill the void, to balance the

equation. There is nothing wrong with this logic, this approach, when one bears in mind that the invented particle is

only a theory, but where scientists go amuck is in claiming a subatomic particle real because it has leapt into their

imagination. A bit of reality testing is required. The electron first appeared on the drawing boards of scientists, but

reality testing followed theory in the development of electrical energy, so widely used in human society as to need no

explanation. All this groping about to explain the workings of the little universe that exists inside each atom is made

difficult by the nature of the study. The subject can't be seen, or measured, so the theories can't be proved. This does

not stop theorists from arguing with one another, however, as the goal is heady. If one understands how the atom

works, one could plot and achieve marvelous feats.

Humans are continuously frustrated by the limitations of their knowledge. Where the common man looks with awe at

academia and scientists working in labs because they seem to understand how it all works, in fact it is no secret that

they are all quite confused. The various departments in the average university could not sit down and discuss the

smallest scientific statement without breaking into argument. The disciplines of science openly contradict each other!

The confused student is left scratching his head, but is still expected to pay his fees promptly. Likewise, research labs

proudly announce their successes, but bury their failures. No right minded financial backer or scientist would proceed

to build something based on theory. Why? Because the theories seldom hold when experiments are run. Most scientific

discoveries are made by accident, and that's a fact. The milk spills into the vinegar by accident, and now the vinegar is no longer sour. By accident.