of this sort before copycat predictions by others.

economic Depression worldwide, in fact and reflected in the Markets, with sabre rattling by many countries to silence their populace with the threat that the wolf was at the border.

increasing failure of Satellites and the Internet, which has recently proven so very accurate, predicted by no one but ourselves.

the arrival of the Second Sun in 2003, sightings at our Coordiantes since 2001, arriving on March 3, 2003 at a coordinate point we predicted in 1997, an astonishing prediction accuracy ignored by the establishment

controlled talk show circuits like the plague.

our ZetaTalk Triangle predicted in 1997 to represent the position of the Earth vs a vs the Sun and Planet X,

appearing in dual crop circles in Nancy’s home state of Wisconsin, both on July 4, both examined by crop circle

experts and one witnessed as it was laid down by the astonished farmer, who was interviewed by the talk radio

circuit where Nancy and our ZetaTalk triangle were ignored.

Individuals with no prediction track record whatsoever are raised up as experts. Anyone with a dream, a hunch, a

theory or an opinon is given the stage, but not Nancy. Going into 2003, the establishment wished to replace Nancy

with others supposedly having her vision, plagarists who it was hoped would prove to be the Pied Piper desired.

Hazelwood did so, well backed and funded, including the 2003 date predictions which he adopted as his own, and has suffered from this ever since. If the White Lie caused the establishment to stumble, it also was a Hazelwood killer. So

how to prevent such takeover attempts in the future? We knew, from our calculations, that the halted and reversed

orbit would be difficult to prove, outright, as the Lean and Tilt toward Planet X, in the arrangement laid out in the ZetaTalk Triangle, would disguise this. Slowing counters the time change expected. The lean counters the view of the

http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta77.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:49 AM]

ZetaTalk: Hazelwood Killer

constellations expected. And as anyone claiming this would be subject to demands to prove it and the establishment is stubbornly silent on the matter, none save the brash ZetaTalk is making the claim. Thus, we arrive at a point where this

will become obvious, with none but ZetaTalk having made the claim.

Assume looking out into the night sky at 20:45 PM on Dec 25. Two hours must be added each month to the

clock time in order to have have the viewer continue to turn so as to look out into the night sky at midnight. This

equates to clock time adjustments of 2 hours / month from Dec 25 to Mar 8, or 4 hours and 24 minutes, or a 1:10

AM view on Dec 25.

Assume slowing of 1 hour 43 minutes to date since Dec 25, relatively unnoticed as just over an hour in increased

daylight is expected, so that as earlier sunrises and later sunsets have been experienced, though amiss from the

the Almanac times, Sun times have been close enough that demands for an explanation can be evaded. This

equates to 1:10 AM minus 1 hour 43 minutes, or a 23:23 PM view on Dec 25.

Assume a lean of 23° eastward, the ZetaTalk triangle position. This is equivalent to moving from West to East

more rapidly, a jump in time. This equates to 1.5 hours of time when a full circle is 24 hours, so later in the

evening, a jump in time, or 00:53 AM on Dec 25.

Assume a tilt in toward the Sun of the N Pole some 20° also, as Planet X lies between the Earth and Sun and the

Earth has dropped in her Ecliptic by several degrees, Planet X now slightly above her in her normal plane. This

equates to East appearing to shift West by this amount, equivalent to a shift in constellations by two weeks to Jan

10 at 0:53 AM.

http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta77.htm[2/5/2012 11:54:49 AM]

ZetaTalk: Newton's Clock

Mail this Page to a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Newton's Clock

written May 19, 2004

What are the forces that keep the Solar System running, like clockwork, the Earth turning so that only a fraction of a second

is lost in a year? It is known by man that the outer planets will speed up and slow down when approaching or leaving each

other, termed perturbations caused by the tug of gravity. Then why would the planets return to their prescribed place,

afterwards? The rigidity of Newton’s Laws are set aside at such times, while human theorists sputter about with Conservation

of Energy abstractions, supposedly some elf in the cosmos registering the slowing and inserting a commensurate acceleration

later, with some kind of cosmic balance scales, ignoring the fact that the last adjustment would carry by the weight of

momentum to be a permanent effect, all other factors being equal. Newton states that the status quo continues, contradicting man's explanation, but man cannot put his theories together on the same page, though continues to state they are all infallible.

Why are perturbations only temporary? As with all things in the solar system, the answer lies in the Sun, which dominates the scene.

We have Stated that the Earth, along with Venus and Mars and the Earth Dark Twin coming up behind her, have all halted in their orbits, presented with Planet X coming toward them in its retrograde orbit. This is not

immediately clear to humans gazing at the sky, as Venus and Mars were coming up behind the Earth at the time the Earth halted in its orbit, and choose to keep their distance from each other, so the distance approximates what

was expected, though making the cover-up Artists nervous.

Вы читаете ZetaTalk: Science
Добавить отзыв
ВСЕ ОТЗЫВЫ О КНИГЕ В ИЗБРАННОЕ

0

Вы можете отметить интересные вам фрагменты текста, которые будут доступны по уникальной ссылке в адресной строке браузера.

Отметить Добавить цитату