ZetaTalk: Transformation

immigrants, who are by their genetic nature exploratory and persistent, but also because the cultural mix encourages

tolerance of new ideas! Thus the great melting pot has fostered a result few anticipated, a synergy that is by its nature a

leader in ideas and a champion for democratic rule. For mankind, the melting pot has proved to be a success.

All rights reserved: [email protected]

http://www.zetatalk2.com/transfor/t65.htm[2/5/2012 11:13:10 AM]

ZetaTalk: Imaging

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Imaging

Note: written during the Feb 16, 2002 IRC session. Planet X and the 12th Planet are one and the same.

The establishment has much discussed this moment, when there will be serious attention given to the object, moving,

in the skies. At the turn of the millennium, it was thought that NASA and their buddy system would call it a nova.

However, with the attention given to the Zeta coordinates, they understood that motion in this object would be under

too much scrutiny. Where explanations that the common man might buy will be floated out, such as the recent

pronouncement about CO2 causing slowing rotation, the establishment knows that the educated man won't buy into

this. Even the little guy, perhaps without wealth but with a brain, can sort though what he observes and hears. To

confirm that the inbound object is a Brown Dwarf, moving at the rate it is, would raise questions as to its distance.

This in conjunction with the closeness to our coordinates would likewise confirm, officially, ZetaTalk. They would

prefer to hide, and ferry the anxious to Nancy and Troubled Times.

The governments in the know about what is coming, or those suspecting based on rumor in the highest circles, have

only a few options. They could come clean, admit a cover-up, and then run and hide to save themselves. This is

unlikely to happen, until perhaps the last week, as these individuals enjoy power and privilege, and are loathe to give it up. They could employ strong arm tactics, invoke martial law, and refuse and eliminate any questions about earth

changes. This requires a military and citizenry well in agreement with these means, which does not exist in either the

US, Canada, or Europe. Even China found the Internet rebutting their lines, re Tianaman Square. The uproar, even

after 911, over loss of individual rights, showed the US that their citizenry were not in agreement. Thus, they have

evolved a third tactic, which it to allow discussion, but ignore it. In other words, no comment.

In Europe, there is likely to be more open discussion of the matter, as in the UK the Planet X issue re- emerged

recently. Britain is also resentful of the US, and the European Community resentful of both. Thus, each country is

likely to respond individually, depending on the public and administrators. Where the country might fare well, there

may be open forums on plans as to what to do, in case. In countries where there will be devastation, such as in India,

no discussion will occur. In countries where there is already suppression of news and discussion, such as Saudi Arabia,

there will be continued suppression. In Scandinavia, which will fare well, there may be open government plans to

assist their populace when the time comes. Thus, as with people, each government or country might take a unique tack,

an unexpected tack, and our predictions wrong or right, depending. These matters are in the hands of man, who has

free choice, and not our hands.

All rights reserved: [email protected]

http://www.zetatalk2.com/transfor/t117.htm[2/5/2012 11:13:11 AM]

ZetaTalk: Star Charts

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Star Charts

Following the posting of an infrared image taken on Jan 5, 2002, the establishment was uneasy but felt the presence of

an existing star in the near vicinity would suffice to explain, in the main, to the man on the street, the image. Those

following the debate closely, which several thousand are, were not so confused, however, but indeed recognized, in

spite of the image makers later protests, that two objects were present in the new image, not on the star charts. In that once is an aberration, in science, but twice is a pattern, the lights went off when the French team came through again

with an image taken on Jan 19, 2002. This had the astonishing association of being:

1. a legitimate image, taken by a student given access to the equipment as a part of a training routine, and

2. having the stamp of the observatory, and

3. accompanied by an ESO star chart to be used as comparison.

They were horrified. All attempts to suppress such an occurrence had slipped through their fingers, as they had not

gone down to the level of trainers and students in their covert warnings to astronomers. The cat was well out of the bag by the time the establishment became aware. Thus, they huddled, no comment being the mode, as Noted by Steve

Havas who found it odd that David Tholen of the Hawaii complex was absent on the sci.astro Usenet for days after this

announcement. The options were discussed. Should they call it a new object, perhaps a nova, and deal with the motion

according to our coordinates later? Should they ignore it, and have their lack of interest rouse curiosity? Should they

state that this is an existing object, the excuse used on Jan 5, 2002, always the most comfortable answer.

They chose the latter, and proceeded to insert an object in the star charts that