has wrongly summoned; but he may not be prosecuted for that at

this Thing; and now thou shalt go back.”

He does so, and told Mord and Asgrim all, word for word, that

Thorhall had said.

Then Mord went to the court, and took witness, and swore an oath

that the greater part of the inquest was rightly summoned, and

said then that he had set the prosecution on its feet again, and

then he went on, “And so our foes shall have honour from

something else than from this, that we have here taken a great

false step.”

Then there was a great roar that Mord handled the suit well; but

it was said that Flosi and his men betook them only to quibbling

and wrong.

Flosi asked Eyjolf if this could be good law, but he said he

could not surely tell, but said the Lawman must settle this

knotty point.

Then Thorkel Geiti’s son went on their behalf to tell the Lawman

how things stood, and asked whether this were good law that Mord

had said.

“More men are great lawyers now,” says Skapti, “than I thought.

I must tell thee, then, that this is such good law in all points,

that there is not a word to say against it; but still I thought

that I alone would know this, now that Njal was dead, for he was

the only man I ever knew who knew it.”

Then Thorkell went back to Flosi and Eyjolf, and said that this

was good law.

Then Mord Valgard’s son went to the court and took witness. “I

take witness to this,” he said, “that I bid those neighbours on

the inquest in the suit which I set on foot against Flosi Thord’s

son now to utter their finding, and to find it either against him

or for him; I bid them by a lawful bidding before the court, so

that the judges may hear it across the court.”

Then the neighbours on Mord’s inquest went to the court, and one

uttered their finding, but all confirmed it by their consent; and

they spoke thus, word for word, “Mord Valgard’s son summoned nine

of us thanes on this inquest, but here we stand five of us, but

four have been challenged and set aside, and now witness has been

home as to the absence of the four who ought to have uttered this

finding along with us, and now we are bound by law to utter our

finding. We were summoned to bear this witness, whether Flosi

Thord’s son rushed with an assault laid down by law on Helgi

Njal’s son, on that spot where Flosi Thord’s son wounded Helgi

Njal’s son with a brain, or a body, or a marrow wound, which

proved a death-wound, and from which Helgi got his death. He

summoned us to utter all those words which it was lawful for us

to utter, and which he should call on us to answer before the

court, and which belong to this suit; he summoned us, so that we

heard what he said; he summoned us in a suit which Thorgeir

Thorir’s son had handed over to him, and now we have all sworn an

Вы читаете Njal's Saga
Добавить отзыв
ВСЕ ОТЗЫВЫ О КНИГЕ В ИЗБРАННОЕ

0

Вы можете отметить интересные вам фрагменты текста, которые будут доступны по уникальной ссылке в адресной строке браузера.

Отметить Добавить цитату