'Tell me anyway.'
There was no need to explain Flora's story; it was in the file, which she had surely read. Her great- grandfather had even included the Latin lines from Ovid's
No one disputed that Zephyrus and Chloris figured in
Botticelli's
'But what if she's really Flora?' he asked.
'After her transformation?'
'Exactly.'
'I don't know. What if it is her?'
The painting could then be read as an allegory for the nature of love. By pairing Flora—a product of lust, of Zephyrus's passion— with the chaste figure of Venus, then maybe Botticelli was saying that true love is the union of both: passion tempered with chastity.
It was possible to read the same buried message in the
'And Venus again represents chastity?'
'Exactly. Venus Pudica.'
She smiled when he adopted the well-known pose of Venus in her shell, modestly covering her nakedness.
'It's a good theory,' she said.
'You think?'
'Yes. Because if it's right, then Flora is a symbol for the erotic, the sexual.'
'Yes, I suppose she is.'
Antonella turned her gaze on Flora. 'Do you see it now?'
He looked up at the statue.
'See the way she stands—her hips are turned away, but they are also . . . open, inviting. Her arm covers her breasts, but only just, like she doesn't care too much. And her face, the eyes, the mouth. She is not
He could see what Antonella was driving at. Maybe he was wrong to have attributed the slight slackness of the pose to the inferior hand of a secondary sculptor. Maybe that sculptor hadn't been striving for delicacy and poise, but for something looser, more sensual. No, that was wrong. He had somehow managed to achieve both—a demure quality coupled with an erotic charge.
'So I'm not wrong?'
'Huh?' he said distractedly.
'I'm not alone. You see it too.'
'It's possible.'
'Possible? It is there or it isn't,' came the indignant reply.
'You're not wrong.'
'Everyone else thinks I am. My grandmother thinks I imagine it, and this says very much about me.'
'What does she think it says about you?'
Even as the words left his mouth he realized it was an impertinent question, far too personal.
'It doesn't matter now,' she replied, 'because we are right and she is wrong.'
He found himself smiling at the ease with which she'd deflected his inquiry, sparing him further embarrassment. His mind, though, was leaping ahead, questions already coalescing. Was it done knowingly? And if so, why? Why would a grieving husband allow his wife to be personified as some prudish yet pouting goddess, some virgin-whore?
The questions stayed with him as they moved on down the slope to the grotto buried in its mound of shaggy laurel. They entered silently, allowing their eyes to adjust to the gloom.
The marble figures stood out pale and ghostly against the dark, encrusted rock of the back wall. In the center, facing left, was Daphne at the moment of her transformation into a laurel tree, her toes turning to roots, bark already girding her thighs, branches and leaves beginning to sprout from the splayed fingers of her left hand, which was raised heavenward in desperation, supplication. To her right was Apollo, the sun god, from whom she was fleeing— youthful, muscular, identifiable by the lyre in his hand and the bow slung across his broad back. Below them, an elderly bearded gentleman reclined along the rim of a great basin of purple and white variegated marble. This was Peneus, the river god, father to Daphne.
The story was straight from Ovid's