Yin and yang are commonly associated with female
and male. The Chinese ontology, so appealing in that
it appears to give whole, harmonious, value-free description of phenomena, describes cosmic movement as cyclical, thoroughly interwoven manifestation of yang
(masculine, aggressive, light, spring, summer) and yin
(female, passive, dark, fall, winter). The sexual identifications reduce the concepts too often to conceptual polarities: they are used to fix the proper natures of
men and women as well as the forces of male and female.
These definitions, like the Jungian ones which are based
on them, are seemingly modified by the assertions that
(1) all people are composed of both yin and yang,
though in the man yang properly predominates and in
the woman yin properly predominates; (2) these male
and female forces are two parts of a whole, equally
vital, mutually indispensable. Unfortunately, as one
looks to day-to-day life, that biological incarnation of
yin, woman, finds herself, as always, the dark half of
the universe.
The sexual connotations of yin and yang, however,
are affixed onto the original concepts. They reflect an
already patriarchal, and misogynist, culture. Richard
Androgyny: The Mythological Model
165
Wilhelm, in an essay on an ancient Chinese text called
meanings o f yin and yang:
Out of the Tao, and the
pole, the supreme ultimate”] there develop the principles of reality, the one pole being the light (yang) and the other the dark, or the shadowy, (yin). Among
European scholars, some have turned first to sexual
references for an explanation, but the characters refer
to phenomena in nature. Yin is shade, therefore the
north side of a mountain and the south side of a river.
. . . Yang, in its original form, indicates flying pennants
and, corresponding to the character of yin, is the south
side of a mountain and the north side of a river. Starting only with the meaning of “light” and “dark, ” the principle was then expanded to all polar opposites,
including the sexual. However, since both yin and yang
have their common origin in an undivided One and
are active only in the realm of phenomena, where yang
appears as the active principle and conditions, and yin
as the passive principle is derived and conditioned, it
is quite clear that a metaphysical dualism is not the
basis for these ideas. 4
Light and dark are obvious in a phenomenological
sense —there is day and it slowly changes into night
which then slowly changes into day. When men began
conceptualizing about the nature o f the universe, the
phenomena o f light and dark were an obvious starting