Schaffner. How fixed is a permanent establishment? Wolters Kluwer, 2013. P. 10.

999

См., к примеру: Convention between the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Kingdom of Norway for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income and on Capital Gains, Article 21 «Miscellaneous rules applicable to certain offshore activities». URL: www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/281378/8801.pdf; Конвенция от 26 марта 1996 г. между РФ и Королевством Норвегия об избежании двойного налогообложения и предотвращении уклонения от уплаты налогов в отношении налогов на доходы и капитал – положения протокола «Офшорная деятельность». URL: www.nalog.ru/html/docs/conv/Norway.pdf.

1000

Arvid K. Skaar. Permanent Establishment: Erosion of a Tax Treaty Principle. Kluwer law and taxation publishers, 1991. P. 539.

1001

A. Mehta. Permanent Establishment in international taxation. Taxmann, 2012. P. 444.

1002

OECD (2014), Model Tax Convention on Income and on Capital: Condensed Version 2014, OECD Publishing, Paris. Commentary to art. 5. § 41.1., P. 111–112.

1003

OECD (2014), Model Tax Convention on Income and on Capital: Condensed Version 2014, OECD Publishing, Paris. Art. 5. § 1., P. 26.

1004

OECD (2014), Model Tax Convention on Income and on Capital: Condensed Version 2014, OECD Publishing, Paris. Commentary to art. 5. § 2., P. 94.

1005

Викулов К. Е. Правила налогообложения иностранных организаций, действующих через постоянное представительство: опыт ОЭСР и правовое регулирование в России: дис… канд. юр. наук. М.: МГИМО, 2011. С. 30.

1006

Коннов О. Ю. Понятие постоянного представительства в налоговом праве: дис… канд. юр. наук. М., 2001. С. 25.

1007

OECD (2014), Model Tax Convention on Income and on Capital: Condensed Version 2014, OECD Publishing, Paris. Commentary to art. 5. § 4–4.6. P. 95–96.

1008

Ibid. Art. 5. § 4.1, P. 95.

1009

Ibid. Art. 5. § 4.1, P. 95.

1010

Ibid. Art. 5. § 4, P.95.

1011

Викулов К. Е. Правила налогообложения иностранных организаций, действующих через постоянное представительство: опыт ОЭСР и правовое регулирование в России: дис… канд. юр. наук. М.: МГИМО, 2011. С. 36.

1012

OECD (2014), Model Tax Convention on Income and on Capital: Condensed Version 2014, OECD Publishing, Paris. Commentary to art. 5. § 8, P. 98–99.

1013

Interpretation and application of Article 5 (Permanent Establishment) of the OECD Model Tax Convention (12 October 2011 to 10 February 2012). OECD Public Discussion Draft. URL: www.oecd.org/dataoecd/23/7/48836726.pdf.

1014

OECD (2014), Model Tax Convention on Income and on Capital: Condensed Version 2014, OECD Publishing, Paris. Commentary to art. 5. § 42.7—42.9, P. 113–114.

1015

Ibid. § 9.1., P. 99.

1016

OECD (2014), Model Tax Convention on Income and on Capital: Condensed Version 2014, OECD Publishing, Paris. Commentary to art. 5. § 20., P. 103.

1017

Bundesfinanzhof № IIR 12/92, 30.10.1996. URL: http://home.germany.net/101-274850/pipeline.html.

1018

TfS 1987.50 LSR.

1019

OECD (2014), Model Tax Convention on Income and on Capital: Condensed Version 2014. OECD Publishing, Paris. Commentary to art. 5. § 8. P. 98–99.

1020

Ibid. § 5.2. P. 96–97.

1021

Amadeus Global Travel Distribution S.A. v. DCIT. URL: itatonline.org/archives/amadeus-global-travel-vs-dcit-itat-delhi.

1022

Galileo International Inc. v. DCIT (2007) TIOL 447 ITAT (Del). URL: https://indiankanoon.org/doc/56225/.

1023

VwGF 21 May 1997, 96/14/0084. URL: www.ris.bka.at.

1024

Administrative Appeals Tribunal (Australia) Case U 162 dated 5 August 1987 (87 ATC 942).

1025

Golf in Dubai LLC, In Re (2008) 174 Taxmann 480 (AAR – New Delhi).

1026

BFH-Urteil vom 3.2.1993 (I R 80–81/91) BStBl. 1993 II S. 462. URL: www.jurion.de/Urteile/BFH/1993-02-03/I-R-80_91, www.jurion.de/Urteile/BFH/1993-02-03/I-R-81_91.

1027

Joseph Fowler v. MNR (2012) 18 taxmann.com 209 (TC–Canada).

1028

OECD Model Tax Convention on Income and on Capital: Condensed Version. Paris, OECD Publishing, 2014. Commentary to art. 5. § 4–4.2. P. 95.

1029

Interpretation and application of Article 5 (Permanent Establishment) of the OECD Model Tax Convention (12 October 2011 to 10 February 2012). OECD Public Discussion Draft. URL: www.oecd.org/dataoecd/23/7/48836726.pdf.

1030

Revised Proposals Concerning The Interpretation and Application of Article 5 (Permanent Establishment) of the Model Tax Convention (19 October 2012 to 31 January 2013). OECD.

1031

Ibid. P. 5.

1032

OECD Model Tax Convention on Income and on Capital: Condensed Version. Paris, OECD Publishing, 2014. Commentary to art. 5. § 4.2–4.5. P. 95–96.

1033

Ibid. § 5.5. Данный параграф был включен в текст Комментария к МК ОЭСР в 2010 г. вслед за выпуском специального отчета ОЭСР, посвященного налогообложению в телекоммуникационном секторе: Tax treaty issues related to common telecommunication transactions. OECD Public Discussion Draft. URL: www.oecd.org/tax/taxtreaties/44148625.pdf.

1034

Revised Proposals Concerning The Interpretation and Application of Article 5 (Permanent Establishment) of the Model Tax Convention (19 October 2012 to 31 January 2013). OECD. § 4.8. P. 10.

1035

Court of Appeal of Ghent, 20 October 2009 / Jean Schaffner. How fixed is a permanent establishment? Wolters Kluwer, 2013. P. 123.

1036

Revised Proposals Concerning The Interpretation and Application of Article 5 (Permanent Establishment) of the Model Tax Convention (19 October 2012 to 31 January 2013). OECD. § 4.8. P. 10.

1037

Sunbeam Corporation (Canada) Ltd. v. Minister of National Revenue (2012) 18 Taxmann 213 (SC–Canada).

1038

Knights of Columbus v. Her Majesty the Queen (2012) 18 Taxmann 211 (TC–Canada).

1039

American Income Life Insurance v. Her Majesty the Queen.

1040

Her Majesty The Queen v. William Dudney (2012) 18 taxmann.com 208 (FC–Canada).

1041

Toronto Blue Jays Baseball Club v. The Minister of Finance (2012) 18 taxmann.com 206 (CA-Ontario).

1042

Syntax Ltd. v. Sous-Ministre du revenue du Quebec (1981) R.D.F.Q.1.

1043

Western Union Financial Services Inc. v. ADIT (2007) 104 ITD 34 (Delhi).

1044

Finanzgericht Rheinland-Pfalz 4. Senat | 4 K 2608/95, 24.04.1998. URL: www.juris.de/jportal/prev/STRE987116170.

1045

Finanzgeright Nürnberg – 2.12.98 – III 84/96.

1046

BFH, Urteil vom 4. 6. 2008 – I R 30/07; FG Köln. URL: http://lexetius.com/2008,2312.

1047

Ericsson Radio Systems A.B. v. DCIT (2005) 95 ITD 269 (Delhi) (SB).

1048

Motorola Inc. V. DDIT (2005) 95 ITD 269 (Delhi) (SB).

1049

Mehta A. Permanent Establishment in international taxation. Taxmann, 2012. P. 122.

1050

Ministry of National Revenue v. Tara Exploration and Development Company Limited (2012) 18 Taxmann.com 215 (SC–Canada).

1051

Elizabeth Herbert v. CIR (2012) 18 taxmann.com 210 (TC – USA).

1052

Inez de Amodio v. CIR (2012) 18 taxmann.com 205 (TC – US).

1053

DDIT (International Taxation) v. Dharti Dredging & Infrastructure Ltd. (2011) 44 SOT 586 (Hyd.).

1054

Nederlandsche Overzee Baggermaschappii B.V. v. DDIT (2010).

1055

DDIT v. Perfetti SPA (2008) 19 SOT 433 (Delhi).

1056

FG Baden-Württemberg, Entscheidung vom 11. Mai 1992 – 3 K 309/91.

1057

F. E. Koch. Double Taxation Conventions. London: Stevens & Sons, 1947. Vol. I. P. 51. Quoting Mitchell B. Caroll before the sub-committee of the committee of U. S. Senate Foreign Relations.

1058

Commissioner v. Visakhapatnam Port Trust 1983 144 ITR 146 AP.

1059

OECD Model Tax

Добавить отзыв
ВСЕ ОТЗЫВЫ О КНИГЕ В ИЗБРАННОЕ

0

Вы можете отметить интересные вам фрагменты текста, которые будут доступны по уникальной ссылке в адресной строке браузера.

Отметить Добавить цитату