ruthless,

who show an early propensity to destroy their opponents without conscience. There are, of course, exceptions, but

these are few and far apart. When it suited the strong tribal leaders to group, then qualities other than brute strength

counted. Nevertheless, the motive was for the self - the leaders of the tribe seeing the tribe as an extension of the self.

Now the ability to negotiate gained in importance, to trade off something of little value for another thing sought. But

have the motives changed? Not at all. So politics is basically a way of having tribal wars and conflicts over resources

in a polite, bloodless way.

Politics steps in when bloody battles would be counterproductive, but politics is discarded when frank war will win the

prize more readily. One should not be fooled simply because the claws of the politicians are retracted. They are still

there, and the hunger is still there. This will be the case on Earth, during the Transformation, as long as 3rd Density

cultures remain on Earth. Depending upon what part of the Earth one lives in, who the neighbors are, there may be a

rapid transition during the Transformation to a different type of politics. The Council of Worlds is elected by true

elections, not by an electorate arrangement which is a percolating-up method that can be controlled, not by a method

whereby only those the power structure has already chosen are presented to you as candidates, but by a true election

such that the type of individual that all desire to see as candidates and all admire are in administrative positions. Our administration goes smoothly because they are highly respected, often directly elected by the individuals that they are

governing.

All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com

http://www.zetatalk2.com/beinghum/b11.htm[2/5/2012 1:28:16 PM]

ZetaTalk: Taking Responsibility

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Taking Responsibility

Note: written by Jul 15, 1995

Many times those who would take a responsible position in life have mixed feelings. Should they step to the helm, be

the one on call, make promises - and then find they lack the leadership or are at a loss for ideas or cannot deliver? At

what point is it safe to offer? Many hesitate, fearing failure not only for themselves but for those who would be the

brunt of their failure - those whom promises were made to. On the other hand some promise blithely, with never a

thought that they may be required to deliver, enjoying the appreciation they receive in advance. And then there is the

other side of the equation, the recipient, who may trust blindly or be guarded, may find themselves delighted at the

results or waiting forever for any results.

Think of the child, whose father has turned his back without any thought of how the child and its mother will survive.

These men are often the most free with slavish promises stated boldfaced to the women they charm. In many cases

they may even believe their own words and be horrified at their behavior, living afterwards with a deep sense of

dismay and shame.

Whichever side of the equation one finds themselves on, how to know when to step up to the plate and how to know

when to trust. This is one of the major lessons of 4th Density in the Service-to-Others orientation. Entities find

themselves on both sides of the equation, disappointed, dazed, confused, and trying not to blame the other for the

mess. Endless discussions sometimes ensue over what went wrong and who should shoulder blame. In the Service-to-

Others orientation, more often than not, both sides of the equation want to take the blame, and this becomes just another issue - who will be allowed to take responsibility for what went wrong.

This lesson, on taking responsibility, is not one we can address with a few words, as it is complex enough to differ for

every situation. However, some guidelines are obvious. When shouldering responsibility the entity should assess their

ability to meet all contingencies. If, for instance, they sense that in the main they are equal to the task, then they should move forward but communicate the points where they feel help from others will be required. If passion to become

involved is strong, but skills or knowledge lacking, the entity may enlist a cohort to team up, thus gaining the skills to match the passions. If confident and experienced, but suddenly finding themselves in a pinch, the entity who has taken

responsibility for a situation should communicate clearly and unmistakably their need for help.

In all cases, the answer is communication and helping hands.

Take the situation of the charming father to be, who has started something which later comes to terrify him. He runs,

or feigns indifference to the child, because he is at a loss at how to proceed. Imagine this situation, all too common in human society, with open communication and helping hands. The father feels free to state that his heart is full of pride

and eager love but he doesn't know how to pick the baby up without breaking it. He may resent the need to spend

precious cash on endless crises and fear the trend will only acerbate. Will his life not matter anymore? How different

matters might be if he could openly discuss his fears and accept help from others, rather than letting his fears build

http://www.zetatalk2.com/beinghum/b05.htm[2/5/2012 1:28:17 PM]

ZetaTalk: Taking Responsibility

until they propel him from the woman and child.

All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com

Вы читаете ZetaTalk: Being Human
Добавить отзыв
ВСЕ ОТЗЫВЫ О КНИГЕ В ИЗБРАННОЕ

0

Вы можете отметить интересные вам фрагменты текста, которые будут доступны по уникальной ссылке в адресной строке браузера.

Отметить Добавить цитату
×