ZetaTalk: Rules

Is the death sentence unique to the Earth? Not at all. All 3rd Density cultures have a death sentence in some form, though vary as to the invoking circumstances or prevalence. Even water worlds, where intelligent life is not in a form that can wreak violence on one another, sentence each other to death. To carry out the sentence entrapment and

starvation are used. As 3rd Density cultures are allowed to function without interference, the prevalence of the death sentence can be misleading.

After 3rd Density things change. 4th Density Service-to-Other cultures never imprison or punish each other, as there is no need. All wish to be of service to the group, and have remorse when another is harmed. There are no crimes, only mistakes. There is no punishment, only amends. There is no probation, only assistance and offers of help. In 4th

Density Service-to-Self cultures the death sentence is an inappropriate name for the frequency with which members

are arbitrarily killed. Where the rules are tight death seldom occurs as then a worker has been lost. However, as in most dictatorships, the lower levels can usually do as they please as long as quotas are being met and matters

humming along as expected. In Service-to-Self cultures members are put to death because they are lame or old or lazy.

If they take advantage of one another, commit a crime, that is of no consequence unless the hierarchy finds their

expectations have not been met.

Between orientations the Rules of Engagement prevail. It would not happen that a Service-to- Other member would be sentenced by a Service-to-Self group, or vice versa. Therefore, in truth, there is no death sentence after 3rd Density.

Among the Service-to-Others death at the hands of another never occurs unless a member has gone berserk, insane,

and kills another while not themselves, or unless there is an accident. Among the Service-to-Self death at the hands of another is not a sentence, as there is no trial. Death is arbitrary and sudden, because one member annoyed another, or for sport, or because they were deemed to be taking from the group more than they were contributing. The death

sentence has for them become a death solution, solely.

All rights reserved: [email protected]

http://www.zetatalk2.com/rules/r29.htm[2/5/2012 11:36:53 AM]

ZetaTalk: Slavery Practices

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Slavery Practices

Note: written Oct 15, 1996.

Slavery is not so much a status in human society as a fact of life on occasion in 3rd Density existence and a continual fact of life in Service-to-Self communities. One can also be enslaved by life circumstances, such that change is

difficult. In human society, a servant may have the status of slave yet be well cared for and treated as an individual.

The servant might be unable to vote or leave for a different job, but this situation is not that much different from what wives in most human society experience. The governor of a country might appear to have the best that life can offer -

power, wealth, and all the perks that come with the job. But in truth he may be a slave to his position, unable to leave the job for fear of retaliation from the many whom he blocked or injured during his reign. He stays on the job out of fear of the consequences of leaving, not unlike the slave who fears physical punishment if he bolts for freedom.

Just as slavery can be one's situation, whether the official term or not, just so the desire to enslave can be clothed falsely. A husband may tell his wife that his desire to keep her from a role in the outside world is for her good, so as to shelter her from rebuffs and demands, while his true intent is to prevent her from gaining the independence that would allow her to leave him. Many governments allow their citizens to vote, but the vote is hollow as the candidates are all from the same class strata. The citizens are told they are controlling the country, but as they cannot get members of all the classes on the ballot, they in fact are continuing to hand the wand of power to the uppers classes, time and again. Thus, to some degree, they remain slaves to the upper classes, which determine where employment can be

gained, the compensation for this employment, and control behavior by threatening to black-list any who don't obey

their rules.

All rights reserved: [email protected]

http://www.zetatalk2.com/rules/r43.htm[2/5/2012 11:36:53 AM]

ZetaTalk: Collision Course

Mail this Pageto a Friend.

ZetaTalk: Collision Course

Note: written Sep 15, 1998. Planet X and the 12th Planet are one and the same.

How might two planets, on some sort of collision course with each other, be dealt with at the Council of Worlds? Is one to be the winner and one the loser? This situation is presenting itself, again, in the coming pole shift to be caused by the periodic passage of the 12th Planet. Since this causes so much havoc on Earth, why not change the course of the 12th Planet, or blow it out of the skies? This might require relocating the intelligent species that inhabit the 12th Planet, but the concept of creating refugees is not foreign to humans, especially when the refugees are to be the other and not the self. Would the Council of Worlds allow the Earth to blow the inhabited 12th Planet out of the skies? The answer is simple - no. Even should humans figure out how to do this, this would not be allowed.

Third Density worlds are not allowed to destroy each other, or interfere heavily with the other's social environment.

Thus, the giant hominoids have been quarantined from your Earth, and man has been quarantined from the Mar's moon

the giant hominoids are currently mining. The Council of Worlds views interfering with nature to this extent. It is not allowed. Nature is a fact that all intelligent entities are adapting to, becoming aware of quite intimately by the necessities of life during incarnations. This is a learning process, and not to be preempted by cheating. The 12th Planet and its periodic passage was a known entity when humans were genetically engineered to begin with. It is nothing

new.

Shuttle explosions, where the payload does not get off the ground, whether the payload was to be sent aloft within the US or another cover country like Russia, are no accident. Prior to these upload accidents in 1998, there were problems out in space that affected expensive equipment and threatened workers, but not the decision makers. These decision

makers have been told that the problems they are trying to put in the path of the traveling planet about to course

through the solar system, it's natural path, will come back closer and closer to home, with each endeavor. They have not listened. Attempts to build space stations with nuclear armaments they can direct, under the disguise of uploading satellites and space exploration equipment, will increasingly falter on Earth, poisoning those who feel they can risk the lives and safety of others, but expect their own safety to be the last threatened. They will learn otherwise, and these lessons have started.