assumes, of
course, a healthy lifestyle, and no disease.
Man is such a creature, with no natural enemies, in that he has intelligence and has not only developed defenses but
actively hunts other creatures, and is rapidly destroying species and habitats around the globe. Yet man seems to die
not of old age, but disease, routinely. Why is this so? The answer lies in the lifestyle, as man can choose his lifestyle, his diet, and tends to choose rich and highly refined foods, a slothful and indolent exercise pattern, and is shocked
when disease pulls him down as a result. Man feeds his livestock and pets a healthy diet, himself not. Man tends to his
machines well, maintaining and oiling them, so they do not break down, but ignores his own body. Man places himself
exposed to substances that poison, smokes cigarettes, and lives in cities with air so polluted it makes his eyes smart.
So in all of this abuse, what causes Alzheimers? We have stated that cancer happens regularly, even to healthy
creatures, during mutations that are inherent in a living creature composed of many cells that must divide. Cancer cells
are simply cleaned up by a healthy immune system. When cancer takes hold to bring the body down, this is because
the body has given up, and seeks the release that death brings. One's psychology can affect the health, as any doctor
puzzling over why one patient, certain to die, lives on while another sinks daily into a death march when expected to
recover. The will to live prevails, often. Are there other bodily functions affected by mood? It should be noted that
Alzheimers seems to come on with age, among the aged, though not in every case. The aged of course are often losing
their edge, find themselves in binds, no longer listened to with respect and anticipating more aches and pains and less
pleasure. Old age, the natural way, seems a long, long way off, and the mind nudges the body to find an earlier out.
The cause and cure for Alzheimers has been a search without results, as the true cause is not being taken into
consideration. As with cancer that evades all attempts to combat it, compared to spontaneous remission, the true cause
of the body's decision to slip into death, early, is not being noted. How can the psychology of the Alzheimers patient
create lesions in the brain? We point to the known documentation on brain health and function in oldsters, that the
active brain stays healthy and
It is not something eaten, something in the air, though an unhealthy lifestyle can make for a body struggling to feel
well, affecting the will to live, certainly. Given that hunger is a strong urge, even the body of one deciding to die will continue to eat. Thus, the out for any creature feeling trapped and wanting an out lies in disease, like cancer or senility.
In cancer the body functions are finally attacked, despite the intake of food on a regular basis so that life otherwise
would go on. In Alzheimers the cancer out has been frustrated by an immune systems that refuses to be sidetracked,
but the genetics for closing out the brain is amenable. Thus, Alzheimers seems to run in families, as does cancer. If the body wants to eat, giving in to the natural urge to put hunger pains aside, the brain washes away to the point of not
sustaining breathing, or heart function. At last, a death from old age, come early!
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta246.htm[2/5/2012 1:27:25 PM]
ZetaTalk: Anorexia
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
The first influence on the babe is the mother's influence, and this occurs well before birth. When the mother becomes
tense, under what circumstances, how much love comes from the mother's heart or whether this is a stingy release,
with anger or a grim desire for control of the environment the prevailing emotion felt. The babe is adjusting to the
mother as it's primary environment, the umbilical cord to survival before birth but likewise a bond that ensures the
babe of survival after birth as well. The babe becomes a politician, if the environment is not warm and loving, in order
to survive, learning when to be politically correct and do the mother's biding to avoid the mother's anger and potential
abandonment.
In households where the mother is control conscious, into control battles with others, and considers the child just
another thing to be controlled, the child has two paths it can follow. It can cooperate, as it must for any kind of peace, or it can rebel. In some, cooperation is complete capitulation, with the eventual adult following religious edicts without question, following the edicts of a corporate head or politician without question, and distressed if required to question as this raises the specter of the mother's abandonment. In others, rebellion sets in early with the child eventually either ejected from the household or virtually so by a mother who ignores and neglects the child as much as allowed by the
society she must live within. The child leaves home, and never returns. More often there is a seething battle, and this is the root cause of Anorexia.
Mother represents food, and whether feeding the child from the breast or from the bottle, will either make these early
sessions a delight of touch and caring or a battle over the outcome. A control oriented mother will not allow
